Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Electromagnetism / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Fixed vs. rotating coils28 Feb 2005 05:29 GMT3
In every motor, speaker and meter I've seen, the coils are mounted on the
rotor and the magnets are fixed.  There are obvious benefits to reversing
this by mounting the coils in a fixed position and allowing the magnets to
spin with to the rotor.  For one, the wiring is simpler ...
Progress with Ultracapacitors27 Feb 2005 23:09 GMT1
I have been following how ultracapacitors were spun off from the defense
industry & the uses they have found in recent years. I want to find out if
there have been any recent improvements or developments with
ultracapacitors?
specialness of 390 degree Kelvin; Meissner Effect27 Feb 2005 19:36 GMT5
In fusion physics the special number of 2/3 begot from enclosing
cylinder in sphere where upper limit is 2/3 per volume or per surface
area. Eventually leads to the proof that fusion has an upper limit of
2/3 Breakeven and is impossible to surpass 2/3 Breakeven because
The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!!27 Feb 2005 10:04 GMT9
http://physicsmathforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55
The Theory of Moving Dimensions
Dr. Elliot McGucken
mcgucken@jollyroger.com
Predicting the maximum Tc possible; NucleiWires in Superconductivity25 Feb 2005 20:19 GMT2
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:38:31 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> The Fusion Barrier Principle FBP says that control of a fusion device
> interfers with its energy output so much that the maximum limit is 2/3
NucleiWires the geometrical cause for Superconductivity; Meissner Effect  a Ampere law24 Feb 2005 18:55 GMT4
I am claiming that Coulomb's law needs a temperature term in numerator
as well as Newton's 2nd law needs to be F=maT.
I am claiming that the Ideal Gas Law of P= nRT/V is a short form of
Coulomb's law where pressure is converted to force and volume to d^2.
North and south poles24 Feb 2005 02:45 GMT2
I would like to know how the magnetic forces of the north and south
poles were formed. Is it gravity or the earth's mass?
A friend of mine said that the north and south pole can never meet
because of opposite attraction.
new concept in superconductivity, not "hole" but MICROWIRES22 Feb 2005 08:25 GMT5
Several days back I mentioned in one of my posts the idea of a
"microwire" inside superconductors that as the temperature gets so cold
that the atoms form microwires. In our observable scale we know and
understand that electric current runs well on the geometry of wires. So
correcting Newton's 2nd Law of Motion Re: Formula for Superconductivity19 Feb 2005 20:10 GMT11
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:31:01 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:22:04 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
One formula for all of conduction, whether superconduction or normal  conduction; Formula is a Coulomb-look-alike only with Temperature in  numerator19 Feb 2005 07:50 GMT1
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 01:55:54 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
in post titled:
Re: Formula for Superconductivity = electronegativities multiplied X T X
R/ d^2; Reconciling Silver to superconductors Re: correcting
Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!16 Feb 2005 05:38 GMT591
http://www.16pi2.com/
http://www.16pi2.com/chapter_4_secrets_of_the_aether.htm
(Colorful sketch of an Aether Unit)
The following is a text of the summary of each chapter in his
The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian15 Feb 2005 05:15 GMT1
"Marvin Edwards" <mbe4talk@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<oB9Qd.380$VI5.163@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> My God but that is long! Do you have an "executive summary" for all us slow
> readers?
Sure:
Formula for Superconductivity is similar to Coulombs law14 Feb 2005 06:31 GMT2
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:43:42 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I wanted to say :
>
> Superconductivity is equal to Electronegativity + Electropositivity
generating negative air ions13 Feb 2005 19:25 GMT17
I would like to make a generator of negative air ions.  I know how to make a
high voltage power supply but I need to know more about what happens at the
emitter.  How do I avoid also generating ozone?  Is there some optimal
voltage for this?  I understand that the emitter should ...
Help: I need to understand the Lorentz force13 Feb 2005 18:06 GMT46
I know how to use the formulas for the Lorentz force (Vector product of
magnetic field and velocity), but I want to understand the follwing:
Why exactly is the Lorentz force a vector product?? Why are charges
always moving perpendicular to the magnetic field and the velocity? In
Pages: 1 2 January, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.