| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Free pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic! | 30 Aug 2005 17:41 GMT | 1 |
You can find an on-line pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic, very good ! free download: http://www.jp-petit.com/TELECHARGEABLES/English/For_a_fistful_of_amperes .htm
|
| 9.6V 18V 24V what's the advantage in hand tools? | 29 Aug 2005 16:35 GMT | 9 |
The ads for hand drills push higher and higher voltages at higher and higher prices but I fail to see the logic. What can be done at 24V can be done at 9.6, just use up the battery space and size the motor windings properly.
|
| Discussions on relativity. | 27 Aug 2005 20:27 GMT | 191 |
Hello Universe, If we humans are to wander among your stars, we must first throw out certain ridiculously wrong notions about physics. The most startling of such nonsense relates to the theories of relativity, which reared up
|
| Free energy and/or intrinsic energy for magnetostriction | 26 Aug 2005 11:54 GMT | 4 |
I facing a little problem right now. I was asked to read up on therdynamic potentials for magnetostriction (to support a doctor thesis). Yes, it was formulated this broadly. The task was: "Magnetostriction:
|
| L. Allen's Poynting vector | 21 Aug 2005 18:13 GMT | 6 |
Dear colleagues, sorry, I do not understand L. Allen's formula. He sets for a linearly polarized plane wave A_x = u exp{i(kz-wt)},
|
| Stupid question of the day.... | 21 Aug 2005 03:38 GMT | 233 |
I am curious about what would happen to an electrical current in 2 situations..... Assume that you have 2 wires that, when joined, complete a closed electrical DC circuit with electrons flowing thusly.....
|
| could this be possible | 19 Aug 2005 18:33 GMT | 30 |
Would u please tell me that if its possible for two observer, who are at rest with each other, to have two different reading of the magnetic field associated with a moving charge (all parameters remains the same regarding distance of separation etc, etc)
|
| An electrostatics problem | 18 Aug 2005 20:51 GMT | 1 |
I'm a new member and I hope I can learn a lot from other members. Now, take a look at this problem, maybe it seems easy, but it has made me mixed up. This is the problem: We have a big plate whose density of charge is s
|
| The Earth is a Huge Psychic Wave Lens | 18 Aug 2005 13:28 GMT | 1 |
{ As told to Diane Jean by "Thomas" } Wave phenomena respond to "Lens Objects" in two commonly known ways
: bending and reflection. Eyeglasses bend light waves and concetrate them so that the wearer can see better. A mirror bends light waves in a
|
| Electromagnetic theory without Relativity | 15 Aug 2005 22:06 GMT | 10 |
Special terminology in this article: {} indicates superscript (including the power). [] indicates subscript. ~A means the vector A.
|
| How energy transfered to light in bulb | 14 Aug 2005 12:54 GMT | 2 |
In a simple circuit, how is the voltage across and current through a light bulb converted to the light energy we see?
|
| NJP's Special Issue on Negative Refraction | 13 Aug 2005 11:22 GMT | 1 |
August 8, 2005 Dear Colleague, A special issue of the open-access New Journal of Physics, focusing on negative refraction, has come online today. The Focus Issue
|
| All are waves. | 09 Aug 2005 13:15 GMT | 235 |
It is quite predictale that all are waves, so check this link: <http://www.zapfuture.com/pid-23.html> Let me know your thoughts.
|
| equality question | 09 Aug 2005 11:52 GMT | 2 |
Is EQ1 equal to EQ2 ? or not? According to Jackson, they are the same, however I am finding they are not equal. What do you say? EQ1 = ((v*a*(x^2 - a^2))/(4*Pi))*Integrate[1, {\[Phi]p, 0, 2*Pi}]* Integrate[(-Sin[\[Theta]p])*((a^2 + x^2 - 2*a*x*Cos[\[Theta]p])^(-3/2) -
|
| Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it | 08 Aug 2005 17:17 GMT | 5 |
Coming to think about my proposal of a Coulomb Unification of the forces of physics where in an Atom Totality the strong-nuclear combines with the weak-nuclear to end up with a nuclear-Coulomb-force. We can envision the Nuclear-Coulomb as the nuclear-electron that resides
|