Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Electromagnetism / August 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Free pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic!30 Aug 2005 17:41 GMT1
You can find an on-line pedagogic comic book on electromagnetic, very
good !   free download:
http://www.jp-petit.com/TELECHARGEABLES/English/For_a_fistful_of_amperes
.htm
9.6V 18V 24V what's the advantage in hand tools?29 Aug 2005 16:35 GMT9
The ads for hand drills push higher and higher voltages at higher and
higher prices but I fail to see the logic. What can be done at 24V can
be done at 9.6, just use up the battery space and size the motor
windings properly.
Discussions on relativity.27 Aug 2005 20:27 GMT191
Hello Universe,
If we humans are to wander among your stars, we must first throw out
certain ridiculously wrong notions about physics.  The most startling
of such nonsense relates to the theories of relativity, which reared up
Free energy and/or intrinsic energy for magnetostriction26 Aug 2005 11:54 GMT4
I facing a little problem right now. I was asked to read up on
therdynamic potentials for magnetostriction (to support a doctor
thesis). Yes, it was formulated this broadly. The task was:
"Magnetostriction:
L. Allen's Poynting vector21 Aug 2005 18:13 GMT6
Dear colleagues, sorry,
I do not understand L. Allen's formula.
He sets for a linearly polarized plane wave
A_x = u exp{i(kz-wt)},
Stupid question of the day....21 Aug 2005 03:38 GMT233
I am curious about what would happen to an electrical current in 2
situations.....
Assume that you have 2 wires that, when joined, complete a closed electrical
DC circuit with electrons flowing thusly.....
could this be possible19 Aug 2005 18:33 GMT30
Would u please tell me that if its possible for two observer, who are
at rest with each other, to have two different reading of the magnetic
field associated with a moving charge (all parameters remains the same
regarding distance of separation etc, etc)
An electrostatics problem18 Aug 2005 20:51 GMT1
I'm a new member and I hope I can learn a lot from other members.
Now, take a look at this problem, maybe it seems easy, but it has made
me mixed up.
This is the problem: We have a big plate whose density of charge is s
The Earth is a Huge Psychic Wave Lens18 Aug 2005 13:28 GMT1
{ As told to Diane Jean by "Thomas" }
Wave phenomena respond to "Lens Objects" in two commonly known ways
: bending and reflection. Eyeglasses bend light waves and concetrate
them so that the wearer can see better. A mirror bends light waves in a
Electromagnetic theory without Relativity15 Aug 2005 22:06 GMT10
Special terminology in this article:
{} indicates superscript (including the power).
[] indicates subscript.
~A means the vector A.
How energy transfered to light in bulb14 Aug 2005 12:54 GMT2
In a simple circuit, how is the voltage across and current through a
light bulb converted to the light energy we see?
NJP's Special Issue on Negative Refraction13 Aug 2005 11:22 GMT1
August 8, 2005
Dear Colleague,
A special issue of the open-access New Journal of Physics, focusing
on negative refraction, has come online today. The Focus Issue
All are waves.09 Aug 2005 13:15 GMT235
It is quite predictale that all are waves, so check this link:
<http://www.zapfuture.com/pid-23.html>
Let me know your thoughts.
equality question09 Aug 2005 11:52 GMT2
Is EQ1 equal to EQ2 ? or not?  According to Jackson, they are the same,
however I am finding they are not equal.  What do you say?
EQ1 = ((v*a*(x^2 - a^2))/(4*Pi))*Integrate[1, {\[Phi]p, 0, 2*Pi}]*
Integrate[(-Sin[\[Theta]p])*((a^2 + x^2 - 2*a*x*Cos[\[Theta]p])^(-3/2) -
Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it08 Aug 2005 17:17 GMT5
Coming to think about my proposal of a Coulomb Unification of the
forces of physics where in an Atom Totality the strong-nuclear combines
with the weak-nuclear to end up with a nuclear-Coulomb-force. We can
envision the Nuclear-Coulomb as the nuclear-electron that resides
Pages: 1 2 July, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.