| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Feynmann's *virtual particle* NEGATiVE-COUNTs, duh.!! | 31 Oct 2005 20:02 GMT | 1 |
$ Feynmann's *virtual particle* NEGATiVE-COUNTs, duh.!! AMBiENT MEDiA does NOT require "virtual particle" *NEGATiVE-COUNTs*.!! A *Zero-AVERAGE* of particle-COUNTs requires *some-NEGATiVE COUNTs*.!! brian a m stuckless
|
| change of phase by rejection | 29 Oct 2005 21:12 GMT | 6 |
Can anyone tell me what is the change of the phase of an EM plane wave by reflection from a mirror. Does it depend on the incidence angle - if yes what is it by 45 degree. I read that it is PI but i'm in trouble with a physical problem and
|
| Weird audio experience | 28 Oct 2005 02:02 GMT | 10 |
Sorry for the crossposting, but I didn't quite know where to send this. I had a weird experience yesterday and I was wondering if this is physically possible or if a few screws temporarily got loose in my head.
|
| magnetic fields in ferromagnets | 27 Oct 2005 03:04 GMT | 7 |
Reading some books I found that there is nothing about the mechanism the magnetic field is spred in the distance of the ferromagnet (like iron). I suppose that the domains rearrange where the outer magnetic field is applied and than they form a new magnet which rearanges the
|
| Superconductor AC Loss info? | 26 Oct 2005 20:32 GMT | 1 |
Anybody know where I can find information on AC losses (hysteresis, etc) in superconductors? I'm especially looking for something that would tell me what the losses in MgB2 and carbon doped MgB2 would be at very high sweep rates (eg 1000-10000 T/s).
|
| Help on Near-to-far-field transformation for 2D TE mode | 26 Oct 2005 19:04 GMT | 1 |
I am developing a FDTD simulation software and get problems calculating the near-to-far-field transformation in the 2D TE-case. Searching the net I found the following post to sci.physics.electromag from 6 Feb. 2004: opticslayman schrieb:
|
| Generation of UV to x rays | 26 Oct 2005 00:47 GMT | 5 |
I need a source of above-UV or near x-rays that must be able to look through the black plastic of electronic components. the object is checking wafer visually, no high resolution is needed, we only want to know the position of the wafer (GaAS 0.2*0.2 mm) in the device. It is
|
| lumped elements in fdtd | 24 Oct 2005 21:14 GMT | 3 |
I'm looking for people who tried to put lumped elements to fdtd codes. I have quite big problem with that. Now i want put the RC or RL filtr. I checked the enter impedance and it's good, but the transmission (Uc/Urc) is not good and I dont know
|
| The canonical spin tensor is wrong | 24 Oct 2005 20:40 GMT | 2 |
I wrote in my post http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.electromag/browse_frm/thread/3f2d4492 bb6e5035/698366bd4ace6bc7?q=khrapko&rnum=1&hl=en#698366bd4ace6bc7 that the standard canonical spin tensor, which is used by physicists, leaded to incorrect results. For example, spin ...
|
| It's had it's day.!! | 24 Oct 2005 10:14 GMT | 2 |
$ It's had it's day.!! jOHN Baez ..on sci.physics.research (s.p.r.).!! S.p.r. MODERATORs are NOT keeping out CRANKs.!! Average QUALiTY of POSTs DROPPED since he left.
|
| Blackbody radiation VS Spectral Line emission | 23 Oct 2005 01:43 GMT | 2 |
Suppose you have a blackbody at temperature T and a pure low-density gas at the same temperature. For T, the blackbody radiation spectrum can be plotted using Planck's theory. I understand that the spectrum of the gas is zero for all wavelengths except for certain "emission
|
| Propagation constant (beta) and wave numbr (k) | 22 Oct 2005 20:30 GMT | 1 |
I'm currently taking course in microwave engineering (and maybe I should already know this) but, what exactly is the difference between the wavenumber k and the propagation constant beta. Is it that k=w*sqrt(permeability*permittivity) and beta is the real part of k
|
| Heisenberg was NOT WRONG ..just because he GOT CAUGHT too OFTEN, "Trying to ((focus)) on BOTH ENDs of VELOCiTY vectors, at once!" | 22 Oct 2005 15:38 GMT | 1 |
Frame-of-Reference ..SPEED versus VELOCiTY: VELOCiTY vector A->B straight from POSiTiON A to B, as shown; o o o o o o o vector
|
| Electric Multipoles Beyond Octupoles? | 20 Oct 2005 12:45 GMT | 5 |
This is a question about electric multipoles, and multipoles in general, that has really been bugging me. Theoretically, how would one construct a multipole where the first nonzero term was the "16-pole" term? What is the simplest, most symmetrical way to construct such a ...
|
| Q on current carrying wire | 20 Oct 2005 04:06 GMT | 3 |
The force on a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field is shown in many books (F=Bil). It is usually depicted as a wire between poles of magnet all in a medium of air. I was wondering if the linearity of F=Bil still holds in a non-linear magnetic environment?
|