| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| On the Theory and Physics of the Aether | 30 Dec 2005 05:16 GMT | 30 |
http://www.doaj.org/abstract?id=126097&toc=y
|
| Electromagnetic Origin of Mass | 29 Dec 2005 22:21 GMT | 5 |
Those interested in pondering the Electromagnetic Origin of Mass may have a look at the paper: Nature and Quantisation of the Proton Mass: An Electromagnetic Model http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0512108
|
| IAM He by jESUS: "Cease & desist in your NONSENSE.!!" | 29 Dec 2005 14:26 GMT | 1 |
IAM He by jESUS: "Cease & desist in your NONSENSE.!!" What if your "f", in hf, is zero (0), dimwit.?!! Y.Porat wrote: > > no mass?? in hf?? CLOSE: Brian A M Stuckless
|
| Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups | 28 Dec 2005 02:48 GMT | 12 |
======== Welcome! to the Physics Newsgroups ========== The sci.physics.* and alt.sci.physics.* newsgroups are forums devoted to the discussion of physics and
|
| Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT unifies quantum mechanics and relativity. | 28 Dec 2005 02:34 GMT | 16 |
http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=56 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: ALL TIED UP & STRUNG ALONG, a movie about String Theorists and their expansive theories which extend human ignorance, pomposity, and frailty
|
| How can the first derivative with respect to time be proportional to the second derivative with respect to space, unless the dimensions are moving relative to one-another? | 27 Dec 2005 01:36 GMT | 8 |
In the Schrodinger equation, the second derivative with respect to the spatial diemsnions is directly proportional to the first derivative with respect to the time dimension. This is because the time dimension is expanding with respect to the
|
| How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity. | 26 Dec 2005 23:35 GMT | 6 |
How Can Here Be There? Entanglement united with relativity. Consider a photon. As it propagates, it stays the exact same place in time. Picture two interacting spin 1/2 particles.
|
| Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots | 26 Dec 2005 08:37 GMT | 144 |
String theorists have no idea what a dimension is. A dimension is just a degree of freedom. It's an abstract concept that indicates that one of the coordinates of a particle can change. You certainly cannot take a dimension and pack it into a little ball. That's ridiculous. Brian
|
| Energy and Mass questions | 24 Dec 2005 09:41 GMT | 4 |
What are the current thoughts on energy and mass. It seems logical to me that the mass of an object is directly related to the oscillation speed of the energy, and that all mass is made up of energy.
|
| Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) | 24 Dec 2005 02:15 GMT | 3 |
From: Dr. H. R. Arabnia C A L L F O R P A P E R S ============================= The 2006 International Conference
|
| WHAT news-MAKER-of-the-week-wanna-be (i.e., or KiTRiNA-benefactor), was CLOSEST to an iNDUSTRiAL LEVEE when KiTRiNA missed NEW ORLEANs? | 19 Dec 2005 09:20 GMT | 1 |
$ The ambient media. WHAT news-MAKER-of-the-week-wanna-be (i.e., or KiTRiNA-benefactor), was CLOSEST to an iNDUSTRiAL LEVEE when KiTRiNA missed NEW ORLEANs? Brian A M Stuckless
|
| Magnetic Field of a pancake coil; or measurement apparatus at 326 kHz | 16 Dec 2005 17:59 GMT | 4 |
Hi -- I'm trying to measure the H-field of a pancake coil used in an induction heater that operates at 326 kHz; about 1kW system. I cannot find any gaussmeters that operate over 50 kHz. So I was
|
| Electromagnetic frequency allocations in xml ? | 15 Dec 2005 23:59 GMT | 4 |
I am not sure if this is the right group, so don't hesitate to kick me towards the right one for asking this. I am updating a nice frequency spectrum "Tool" in Flash. See the old one here: (http://www.e-builds.com/EM%20spectrum/). A lot of new
|
| magnetism question | 13 Dec 2005 04:30 GMT | 2 |
Hi I have a question: Say you have a flux distribution due to a magnet, then you place a piece of iron beside the magnet and you get a new flux distribution. The flux density in the iron will be greater than the flux density in
|
| gravity and magnetism, 2 forces interelated? | 12 Dec 2005 20:29 GMT | 2 |
I posted this item earlier and continue to seek an intelligent reply. It is curious how the quantum fly-in-the-ointment pertains to the affect of the observer on the observed. This continues to be an issue on the macro scale. When scientist peer through glasses clouded with ...
|