| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Poynting vector. Arithmetic mistake | 28 Feb 2006 22:04 GMT | 26 |
It was found that many physicists did not know how to calculate the Poynting vector. According to Jackson [1] (6.132), a time-average flux of energy in the z-direction given by the z-component of the real part of the complex Poynting vector S = (E x B*)/2. But authors of [2 - 6]
|
| THERMAL mass transfer. | 27 Feb 2006 08:51 GMT | 1 |
[THERMAL mass transfer]: Gerald L. O'Barr wrote: > -=-
> In <oPtJf.48922$dW3.25797@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> > >> I know they say a photon **doesn't** have a [REST] mass. > Tom Roberts wrote: -=-SNiP-=- -=- eV/c^2. -=- |
| Looking for good references on aether models for Maxwell's equations | 24 Feb 2006 09:12 GMT | 24 |
It seems that both Fitzgerald and Reynolds had constructed mechanical models that describe Maxwell's equations. It seems that these models where based on a large number of tiny spheres connected by rubber
|
| Journal of Mathematical Physics and the field theory. | 24 Feb 2006 07:40 GMT | 1 |
I sent five papers to JMP and concluded that editors of the journal are incompetent to face problems of the field theory. In a paper "Defects of the general field theory" (05-1075, January 4, 2006 9:17 PM) I show that the standard classical electrodynamics does
|
| Re: The Metastases of Entropy. | 24 Feb 2006 01:29 GMT | 1 |
Pentcho Valev wrote: >
> By the end of 19th century J. Gibbs converted the first law of > thermodynamics > > dE = dQ - PdV (1) |
| Contradiction inside of the electrodynamics | 22 Feb 2006 19:25 GMT | 7 |
I considered absorption of a circularly polarized light beam in a dielectric in the frame of the standard electrodynamics. I calculated energy, momentum, and angular momentum that were carried by the beam and that were absorbed in the dielectric. The energy and momentum were
|
| Re: Photon Mass. | 22 Feb 2006 03:24 GMT | 2 |
GUESS iNTRiNSiC energy eM = m1*c^2 = VARiABLE REST mass*c^2 = E - eK = EQUiVALENT REST energy = E - (m1^2*v1^2/2*M1) = SYSTEM " " e = E - (m1*v1^2/2)*(m1/M1 + 1) - (m1*v1^2/2)
|
| Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com | 20 Feb 2006 01:54 GMT | 7 |
http://physicsmathforums.com Hello All, Please respect that Moving Dimensions Theory is just a theory. I look forward to feedback and insights regarding its logic.
|
| Beyond Not Even Wrong: Beyond String Theory: New Theories on Time Rocking The Physics World http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?p=1332#post1332 | 19 Feb 2006 20:13 GMT | 5 |
From: http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?p=1332#post1332 sciencenews sciencenews is offline Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2006
|
| Sting Theory's Postulates, Laws, and Experimentally Verified Equations. Waht? There Are None? Then Why Do We Support It With Billions? | 19 Feb 2006 11:22 GMT | 16 |
http://physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=69 The Inmates ($tring Theorist$) Are Running The Asylum $tring theory has done far more damage to physics than just $tring theory itself.
|
| Space is full of photon gas. | 19 Feb 2006 02:08 GMT | 1 |
Bilge wrote: > [his straw DOPPEL] > guskz@hotmail.com: > >
> >I know they say a photon **doesn't** have a [REST] mass. > >>> > >But do we know the amount of energy a single photon can produce > >and then use E=mc^2 thus m = E/c^2 (or another similar equation)? |
| Generation of Large Electrostatic field | 18 Feb 2006 16:21 GMT | 14 |
I'm trying to figure out a simple way in which to create a large, static electric field (at least 10^4 V/m, if not 10^5 or even higher) over a short distance (about, or less than, 1cm). Could I simply hook some high voltage source up to a parallel plate type configuration and
|
| Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}. | 18 Feb 2006 03:14 GMT | 2 |
1. Elementary CHARGE (i.e. Amp*sec), {e} ..mathematically speaking: $$ _ _ _ _ _ $$ / (C_2)^2 $$ (+ OR -) Elementary CHARGE {e} = (+ OR -), / -- --- --
|
| Uniting Quatumn Entanglement (Action at A Distance) and Relativity--Moving Dimensions Theory | 18 Feb 2006 00:07 GMT | 1 |
http://physicsmathfoums.com Hello All! I was hoping you could help me. I have come up with a theory that has a simple postulate and is rooted
|
| Another School Question | 17 Feb 2006 04:50 GMT | 2 |
Anyone care to help me with the following problem? ___ Q: Find the electric potential of a point charge q embedded in a linear, homogeneous, anisotropic dielectric.
|