| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| soft iron rods | 26 May 2006 02:53 GMT | 1 |
I'm building a magnetic generator. So I need to buy some soft iron rods. I
found some on a US webite which
were 13mm diameter by 15cms long which were perfect, but they wont ship
overseas and I live in Australia. Anyone know of a supplier of this sort of
|
| Is the "self-inductance of straight wire" an ill-defined concept? | 15 May 2006 18:20 GMT | 22 |
Browsing the litterature on lightning protection I often
come across assertions of the following variety:
To route lightning currents to the earth, it is better to
use wide, flat copper straps preferrably with no bends
|
| electric-field flux | 12 May 2006 04:33 GMT | 1 |
Two point charges (1*10^-9C and -1*10^-9C) are separated to the distance
of 10cm. Find electric-field flux through the circle with radius of 5cm
if the circle lies in a plain perpendicular to the junction of two
charges with its origin in the center of junction?
|
| On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces | 07 May 2006 10:26 GMT | 3 |
This paper has proposed a theoretical idea to construct particles by
using electron, positron, neutrino and anti-neutrino as well as the
weak force interaction among them; it has theoretically estimated the
radii of neutron and proton as well as the range and strength of
|
| Editors of Phys. Rev. A evade problems | 06 May 2006 19:23 GMT | 15 |
I submitted four papers to PRA and concluded that editors of the
journal are not prepared to consider challenging papers.
1. In a paper "Beth's experiment modification" (AL8967, 16 Nov 2003), I
show that a celebrated Beth's experiment is one of phenomena that
|
| m*a=m*g, g CONSTANT. | 06 May 2006 05:05 GMT | 1 |
$$ Mike wrote: > > carlip-nospam@physics.ucdavis.edu wrote:
-=-
> > Gravitational mass, on the other hand,
> > is the mass that appears in Newton's gravitational force law, |
| matter of fact. | 06 May 2006 05:03 GMT | 1 |
$$ Igor wrote: > guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Hawking's book: "Black holes aint so black" perhaps even -=- Re: Light not only at the event horizon, black holes = 100% light
(no matter)
|
| not MY isRAELiS. | 04 May 2006 03:18 GMT | 1 |
$$ 'Webster's NEW WORLD Dictionary' Semites.
$$ [All Arabs and jEWs (mostly brownish people) are Semites].
$$ [Or ALMOST all except for Cat Stevens & an ARMY deserter].
$$ [To wit, the documented RASH of anti-Semitic "nose-jobs"].
|
| Re: A question about the bending of light. | 04 May 2006 03:15 GMT | 2 |
$$ Golden Boar wrote: >
> Why is the amount of bending of light
> twice the value predicted by Newton's laws?
> Is this because photons are gravitaionally attracted |
| Newton ..with (n - 1), gives the EXACT answer. | 04 May 2006 03:14 GMT | 1 |
$$ Golden Boar wrote: >
> Why is the amount of bending of light
> twice the value predicted by Newton's laws?
> Is this because photons are gravitaionally attracted |
| WHY m1*v1=M1*v. | 04 May 2006 03:10 GMT | 1 |
$$ Bill Hobba wrote -=-
> Physics is an experimental science.
> Every assumption - it does not matter how 'obvious' -
> requires experimental support. |
| A general question | 03 May 2006 21:56 GMT | 1 |
I think most of the u might be using windows os,why is it not possible
to create a folder with a name con ??.(Might be a bug in the code)
|
| Interpritation of the wave equation | 03 May 2006 11:27 GMT | 4 |
Can someone briefly explain about the equation for a wave travelling
in +ve Z direction which is given as : expj(wt-beta*z).What does the
term j represent(I know it's imajinary)
|
| Simple question about magnet and metal | 01 May 2006 05:26 GMT | 4 |
I know that the magnetic field doesn't do any work to particles. I
wonder why the magnet can make metal move. Base of Lorenz Force, if the
object does not move, therefore, there shouldn't be any force apply on
the object. Then, how can those stationary object moves without ...
|
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage
Start New Thread