| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| A letter to Professor Alwyn van der Merwe, Editor of "Foundation of Physics (Letters)" | 30 Jul 2006 18:46 GMT | 8 |
Dear Professor Alwyn van der Merwe. You rejected six my paper without any reviewing: "Violation of the gauge equivalence" of May 28, 2001, "Radiation of spin from a rotator" of May 3, 2002,
|
| Can electromagnets push? | 29 Jul 2006 06:53 GMT | 2 |
A question for anyone who can provide some proof or bibliographic references behind the answer: Let's assume that we have a solenoid, i.e. an electromagnet - conductor wire wrapped around a hollow core with alternating current
|
| Marasmus of "Optics Connumications" editors | 22 Jul 2006 22:32 GMT | 3 |
Dr. Kawata rejected my paper "A rotating electric dipole radiates spin and orbital angular momentum" on July 14, 2006. His message is short: "The paper under consideration is erroneous. The spin of an
|
| Paradox of dipole radiation and PRA | 22 Jul 2006 09:12 GMT | 2 |
A rotating electric dipole radiates angular momentum mainly in the plane of the rotation, but circularly polarized radiation is radiated mainly along the axis of rotating. I explain this paradox using a new physical concept of classical spin. Unfortunately, my paper "Rotating
|
| The geometric representation of spin for elliptic polarized light | 22 Jul 2006 07:46 GMT | 1 |
A very general form of electromagnetic waves is the so called elliptic polarized light. The electrical field of the propagating beam or plane wave rotates around the propagation direction
|
| induction | 22 Jul 2006 00:52 GMT | 1 |
I am trying to asertane if the properties of a stator (stationary) would react in the same fashion as a transformer if it were EXPOSED to a sationary magnetic field instead of moved through it. (ie; if the stator was within the magnetic field and the power turned on and off to
|
| Narrow-mindedness and insolence of "Optics Connumications" editors | 18 Jul 2006 05:51 GMT | 3 |
Narrow-mindedness and insolence of OC editors are boundless. Dr. Kawata could move forward through four lines of my paper only since March 22, 2006 Nevertheless he wrote:
|
| Institute of Physics journals defend corporate interests as usual | 18 Jul 2006 05:29 GMT | 2 |
IOP journals proclaim the company policy that once an article has been rejected from one Institute of Physics journal, they cannot consider it for another. This policy permits to reject papers arbitrarily, without reviewing.
|
| "Physics Letters A" does not have referees of principle | 18 Jul 2006 04:24 GMT | 1 |
Journal "Physics Letters A" does not have referees of principle. None is willing to review my paper "Defects of the general field theory" because I show that the canonical energy-momentum and spin tensors are wrong, and physicists fail to correct this tensors by the
|
| No Back EMF in Magnet? | 17 Jul 2006 00:48 GMT | 1 |
When we pass an electrical current through a Magnet, it would accelerated and rotate faster. If we do that with existing motor, there is ceiling which limit the maximum upper rotational speed due to Lenz's Law. It appears that it is due to the effect of Back EMF, but why does
|
| My Questions | 16 Jul 2006 17:08 GMT | 1 |
1. How do understand the Parallel Path Technology in terms of your understanding of Physics? http://www.flynnresearch.net/Parallel_Path_Technology.htm 2. When an object is in vibration, it follow from Einstein's theory
|
| mind control | 14 Jul 2006 23:17 GMT | 3 |
I have been a victim of mind control devices since i was a child. received an anonymous e-mail at age 46 that stated that what I wa 'hearing", not in the physical sense of the word, was neurophone type device. Then I started recalled what happened i
|
| Re: The Achilles Heel of String Theory. | 14 Jul 2006 20:20 GMT | 7 |
> On 5 Jul 2006 17:28:48 -0700, "Timothy Golden > BandTechnology.com" <tttpppggg@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >S D Rodrian wrote: |
| Speed vs velocity. | 12 Jul 2006 03:16 GMT | 1 |
> The [DiFFERENCE] between SPEED and VELOCiTY: $$ o o o o $$ o o o vector $$ o o o PROjECTiON
|
| Electrostatic Field Question | 08 Jul 2006 03:36 GMT | 8 |
My question has to do with actual measurements of a homogeneous electrostatic field of E V/m in air. A voltage is observed between two
|