| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Photon radiation from accelerating electrons? | 25 Dec 2006 00:47 GMT | 9 |
It is commonly claimed that an electromagnetic model of the atom won't work because electrons radiate energy under acceleration and would therefore spiral into the nucleus. The general idea is that when an electron is accelerated it radiates energy, increasing its inertia, and
|
| Simple Faraday's Law question. | 23 Dec 2006 20:31 GMT | 2 |
If there is a changing flux through a loop of conducting wire then a current is produced. Lens' law says that this current produces a B field that opposes the change. But wait, should this new B field be included in with the original whose changing flux is causing the
|
| EM problem | 21 Dec 2006 02:54 GMT | 4 |
I need someone to double check my work. In Ohanian's EM book he has the following question under the problem section ---------------------------------------------- A circular annulus of inner radius R1 and outer radius R2 has a
|
| a complete replcement of clerk maxwell | 17 Dec 2006 23:55 GMT | 1 |
I have applied to the Open University to accept a dissertation on "the complete replacement of clasical electromagnetism by quantum mechanics and special relativity". My web page http://www.newelectricity.co.uk has most of my thesis.
|
| electromagnetic waves | 17 Dec 2006 16:14 GMT | 2 |
hey i was wondering if anyone know what effect does electromagnetic waves have on the human body?? e.g.waves from a cell phone?
|
| How does a magnetic field induce an emf in a wire ? | 17 Dec 2006 09:47 GMT | 1 |
If this is off topic please point me in the correct general direction. As an electrical engineer I was taught that if I move a magnet close to a wire connected to a volt meter (VM), I would get a reading because of Faraday's law of induction. How does this work at the particle ...
|
| The complete absurdity. | 16 Dec 2006 16:01 GMT | 8 |
S. Margulies, C. Utreras-Diaz, and E. Dietz published wrong papers in Am. J. Phys. (52 515, 56 700, 72 1499), and D. Griffiths made an error in the "Introduction to Electrodynamics". To show their mistakes, I quoted their Figures in the Introduction to my paper submitted to AJP.
|
| Neutron, electrostatic fields and strong force | 11 Dec 2006 20:18 GMT | 1 |
Using basic electrostatic field theory, I did a numerical integration over all space of the interaction between the electrostatic fields of two electrons, which agreed (as expected) with Coulomb's Law. But I found out that there is a spherical region between the two electrons
|
| Maxwell electrodynamics needs a concept of classical spin for completing | 10 Dec 2006 22:59 GMT | 9 |
It is a submission to "Nature": Angular momentum conservation law is a fundamental law of nature. It is considered that no violation of the law exists. However, it was found the celebrated Beth's optics experiment contradicted the law in the
|
| Last Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06) | 07 Dec 2006 12:28 GMT | 2 |
From: Prof. H. R. Arabnia C A L L F O R P A P E R S ============================= The 2006 International Conference
|
| TLM | 02 Dec 2006 18:36 GMT | 1 |
I am new to transmission line modelling transmission line modelling (TLM). is there anybody having experience with it. As far as I know, I think it's relatively simpler algorithm compared to other methods in EM field. The main idea of TLM is to simulate the
|