| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Question about Segmentation | 28 Jul 2004 16:56 GMT | 3 |
I am not a biologist, so please use small words I can understand. My question is whether certain features in vertebrates, like ribs, vertebrae, and the abdominal "six pack" follow from segmentation in an ancestor to chordates.
|
| Stem cells and Human evolution | 27 Jul 2004 16:39 GMT | 14 |
I'll begin by saying that I am completely in favour of stem cell research as I do see a lot of potential benefit as a result of its careful application. However, once I temporarily ignore some of the more common controversies surrounding this topic, I am left wondering
|
| What if a person was cut cleanly in half from head to toe? | 27 Jul 2004 06:17 GMT | 12 |
I've always wondered what would happen if the left and right halves of the human body were completely seperated, and somehow kept alive. What would conciousness be like? Would the new "beings" still perecieve themselves as one person, or two different entities? I've heard of people
|
| Kin Selection contradiction? | 24 Jul 2004 22:47 GMT | 123 |
I have read many explanations of kin selection that are based on the "fact" that I share 1/2 of my genes with each of my parents and siblings, 1/8 of my genes with each of my first cousins, etc. I have also seen it stated many times that each human shares a very
|
| Hamilton's Rule: evade all rational discussion? | 23 Jul 2004 23:11 GMT | 9 |
Name And Address Supplied wrote:-
> > JM:- > > The only proper answer to the question "What is > > the difference between +c and -c?" is "2c"! |
| Genes affecting dispersion - Hamilton's neglected idea | 21 Jul 2004 16:35 GMT | 5 |
The last thing I really want to do is to start another Hamilton's rule thread. But I was rereading Lonely Roads the other day, and I noticed something I had missed before. The 1964 paper is not just about the evolution of genes affecting "b" and "c" (altruism and
|
| Watt's Nepean Creek theory of grassland evolution | 21 Jul 2004 16:35 GMT | 2 |
Theory: the height of the grass determines the height of the grazer First Lemma: the height of the grass determines the height of the predator Second Lemman: the extinction of giant grasses caused the extinction of giant grazers and of giant predators.
|
| Article: How yeasts evolve | 21 Jul 2004 16:35 GMT | 12 |
How yeasts evolve Publication of four more genomes confirm disputed whole genome duplication theory By Cathy Holding
|
| rooting of unrooted trees | 20 Jul 2004 16:51 GMT | 13 |
Dear NG, there is an unrooted phylogenetic tree (cladogram) and I do know the charakters of internodes. How can I root the tree without using an outgroup?
|
| Search for sequence alignments | 20 Jul 2004 16:51 GMT | 1 |
I am working on a new algorithm for phylogenetic tree reconstruction. In order to validate my methods, I am looking for sequence alignments with the following characteristics: - hundreds to thousands of taxons
|
| Bioinquiry:Making Connections in Biology | 19 Jul 2004 03:42 GMT | 1 |
I will be starting my first teaching job in a community college this Fall for an introductory Biology course. I will be using a text called "Bioinquiry:Making Connections in Biology". Has anyone reviewed this text before?
|
| Giant Hogweed - Photos | 19 Jul 2004 03:42 GMT | 1 |
Some pictures of the Giant Hogweed. Came across this giant plant on an evening walk. http://y2u.co.uk/&002_Images/Hogweed%2001.htm Apparently this plant has a sap that causes ultra-violet sensitivity
|
| No Infertility Cost for Human Longevity | 17 Jul 2004 21:58 GMT | 2 |
A new publication just came out, which shows that exceptional human longevity is *NOT* associated with infertility (contrary to the earlier widely publicized article published in "Nature"): Does Exceptional Human Longevity Come With High Cost of Infertility?
|
| Article: Dust worms hold the key to planet formation | 17 Jul 2004 21:58 GMT | 1 |
Dust worms hold the key to planet formation Maggie McKee 19:08 13 July 04 Elongated dust worms - rather than fluffy blobs of dust - are the seeds of
|
| RE: "Relative fitness" and other evolution pertaining | 15 Jul 2004 18:30 GMT | 3 |
"Peter F." <effectivespamblock@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> > JE:- > > I have consistently argued that fitness > > is an OBJECTIVE ABSOLUTE ASSUMPTION <snip> |