| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| testosterone in females | 19 Oct 2005 18:34 GMT | 1 |
Am Nat. 2005 Oct;166 Suppl 4:S85-98. Testosterone in females: mediator of adaptive traits, constraint on sexual dimorphism, or both? Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr, Sandell M.
|
| Musings about the Cambrian Explosion | 19 Oct 2005 07:06 GMT | 43 |
I would enjoy reading speculations from contributors to sbe on notions about what caused the so-called 'explosion' of diversity during the Cambrian. My purpose here is not to merely reiterate what has been speculated in documentaries on TV but, rather, to speculate about some
|
| Empirical Vs Mathematical Events ( was Re: Underestimating 'r') | 17 Oct 2005 19:15 GMT | 1 |
name_and_address_supplied@hotmail.com wrote:- I have snipped almost all of NAS's response because the part below remains the most central issue which can be summed up as: the CRITICAL difference between an empirically based event and just a non empirically based
|
| ?Evolutionary cause for oxygen peak ~50 Myrs. ago? | 17 Oct 2005 19:15 GMT | 5 |
The current sciam.com website (for Scientific American) has a small piece on evidence that oxygen content of the earth's atmosphere was about 10% during the mesozoic, but the % rose after the K/T extinction event and peaked at about 23% at
|
| Empirically Measuring Mutualism In Man | 17 Oct 2005 05:32 GMT | 7 |
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/Zak%20-%20Trust.pdf. In human business activity trust really matters. Why? Simply because we cannot cooperate without it. If we cannot cooperate while we inevitably compete we can't take the enormous individual based gains that only
|
| Can evolution go backwards? | 17 Oct 2005 05:32 GMT | 30 |
Is there such a thing as backwards evolution or is it all form fits function - if the environment changes then so do we. I was wondering for instance if we use our brains less would the size reduce! Also is evolution a step by step process or are there times when there is a
|
| PIP you may like this study | 16 Oct 2005 07:42 GMT | 1 |
Semipermeable lipid bilayers exhibit diastereoselectivity favoring ribose. Sacerdote MG, Szostak JW. Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital,
|
| Most influential person in evolutionary biology | 15 Oct 2005 06:22 GMT | 2 |
[On the thread "Most important paper in evolutionary biology", William Morse wrote:]
> ... while the "Spandrels" paper has been much discussed in > pop science, I think Crow and Kimura is a much better cite |
| biology | 14 Oct 2005 17:17 GMT | 2 |
Can anyone help me. I have started a course in biotechnology and now feel that it is above me. Is there any good books out there that could help me. I want to continue with my studies but am finding getting the information quite hard.
|
| Partial Replication May have come first | 13 Oct 2005 01:11 GMT | 1 |
A friend, commenting on replication through a sun forced denaturing and annealing process said, "...the last to denature will be the last and hence slowest to replicate and thus will be diluted out, depending upon the temperature
|
| Life Definition | 13 Oct 2005 01:11 GMT | 1 |
Life: Novel reactions of certain chemicals to the forced energy from a sun/heat cycle that increases their stability in that
|
| Most important paper in evolutionary biology | 12 Oct 2005 05:29 GMT | 112 |
About a year ago, this newsgroup received an invitation to submit nominations for 'the most beautiful experiment in biology'. As you may know, the title of 'the most beautiful experiment in molecular biology' has been informally held by the Meselson-Stahl
|
| Unequal branch lengths | 12 Oct 2005 05:29 GMT | 29 |
I am puzzled by the phenomenon of unequal branch lengths in phylogenetics. Not so much by the confounding effects ('long branch attraction' and the like) as by what the existence of unequal branches tells us.
|
| Re: Ratchets against devolutionary speciation (was: Can evolution | 10 Oct 2005 16:37 GMT | 1 |
> r norman NotMyRealEmail@_comcast.net wrote: > The real problem with devolution is probabilistic. Given that > mutations are random (sorry, John Edser, you are likely to grumble > here), then evolution can be modeled (here, too) as a random walk |
| Response to Orgel Article | 10 Oct 2005 16:37 GMT | 1 |
This is in response to the Leslie E. Orgel essay, "The Origin of LIfe on the Earth. "It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acds, both of which are structurally complex, arose
|