Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Evolution / October 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
testosterone in females19 Oct 2005 18:34 GMT1
Am Nat. 2005 Oct;166 Suppl 4:S85-98.
Testosterone in females: mediator of adaptive traits, constraint on sexual
dimorphism, or both?
Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr, Sandell M.
Musings about the Cambrian Explosion19 Oct 2005 07:06 GMT43
I would enjoy reading speculations from contributors to sbe on notions about
what caused the so-called 'explosion' of diversity during the Cambrian.  My
purpose here is not to merely reiterate what has been
speculated in documentaries on TV but, rather, to speculate about some
Empirical Vs Mathematical Events ( was Re: Underestimating 'r')17 Oct 2005 19:15 GMT1
name_and_address_supplied@hotmail.com wrote:-
I have snipped almost all of NAS's response because the part below remains
the most central issue which can be summed up as: the CRITICAL difference
between an empirically based event and just a non empirically based
?Evolutionary cause for oxygen peak ~50 Myrs. ago?17 Oct 2005 19:15 GMT5
The current sciam.com website (for Scientific American) has
a small piece on evidence that oxygen content of the earth's
atmosphere was about 10% during the mesozoic, but the % rose
after the K/T extinction event and peaked at about 23% at
Empirically Measuring Mutualism In Man17 Oct 2005 05:32 GMT7
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/Zak%20-%20Trust.pdf.
In human business activity trust really matters. Why? Simply because we
cannot cooperate without it. If we cannot cooperate while we inevitably
compete we can't take the enormous individual based gains that only
Can evolution go backwards?17 Oct 2005 05:32 GMT30
Is there such a thing as backwards evolution or is it all form fits
function - if the environment changes then so do we. I was wondering for
instance if we use our brains less would the size reduce!
Also is evolution a step by step process or are there times when there is a
PIP you may like this study16 Oct 2005 07:42 GMT1
Semipermeable lipid bilayers exhibit diastereoselectivity favoring ribose.
Sacerdote MG, Szostak JW.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department
of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Most influential person in evolutionary biology15 Oct 2005 06:22 GMT2
[On the thread "Most important paper in evolutionary biology",
William Morse wrote:]
> ... while the "Spandrels" paper has been much discussed in
> pop science, I think Crow and Kimura is a much better cite
biology14 Oct 2005 17:17 GMT2
Can anyone help me. I have started a course in biotechnology and now
feel that it is above me.  Is there any good books out there that could
help me.  I want to continue with my studies but am finding getting the
information quite hard.
Partial Replication May have come first13 Oct 2005 01:11 GMT1
A friend, commenting on replication through a  sun
forced denaturing and annealing process said,
"...the last to denature will be the last and hence slowest to
replicate and thus will be diluted out, depending upon the temperature
Life Definition13 Oct 2005 01:11 GMT1
Life:
Novel reactions of certain chemicals to
the forced energy from a sun/heat cycle
that increases their stability in that
Most important paper in evolutionary biology12 Oct 2005 05:29 GMT112
About a year ago, this newsgroup received an invitation to submit
nominations for 'the most beautiful experiment in biology'.  As
you may know, the title of 'the most beautiful experiment in
molecular biology' has been informally held by the Meselson-Stahl
Unequal branch lengths12 Oct 2005 05:29 GMT29
I am puzzled by the phenomenon of unequal branch lengths in
phylogenetics.  Not so much by the confounding effects
('long branch attraction' and the like) as by what the
existence of unequal branches tells us.
Re: Ratchets against devolutionary speciation (was: Can evolution10 Oct 2005 16:37 GMT1
> r norman NotMyRealEmail@_comcast.net  wrote:
> The real problem with devolution is probabilistic.  Given that
> mutations are  random (sorry, John Edser, you are likely to grumble
> here), then evolution can be modeled (here, too) as a random walk
Response to Orgel Article10 Oct 2005 16:37 GMT1
This is in response to the Leslie E. Orgel essay,
"The Origin of LIfe on the Earth.
"It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic
acds, both of which are structurally complex, arose
Pages: 1 2 3 4 September, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.