| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Article: On Noise in Gene Expression | 29 Nov 2005 03:50 GMT | 7 |
ON NOISE IN GENE EXPRESSION The following points are made by J.M. Raser and E.K. O'Shea (Science 2005 309:2010): 1) Any individual in a population of living organisms or cells is unique.
|
| Re: The uncorrected simplifications/oversimplifications of | 28 Nov 2005 06:28 GMT | 10 |
name_and_address_supplied@hotmail.com wrote:-
> > JE:- > > There are no axiomatic truths within the sciences only within > mathematics. |
| Hamilton's rule in small population | 28 Nov 2005 06:28 GMT | 68 |
OK, here goes. A derivation of something like Hamilton's rule for a small population for the behaviour of AA organisms (two copies of the same allele). I'm setting up the scenario as follows to try to keep
|
| Chemicals Do Not Benefit | 23 Nov 2005 22:55 GMT | 10 |
Chemicals do NOT benefit from any aspect of life. Chemicals do not benefit from metabolism Chemicals do not benefit from replication Chemicals do not benefit from cell membranes
|
| Evolutionary interplay of caution and boldness in populations | 21 Nov 2005 06:35 GMT | 4 |
A recent study in the journal Cell, by Gleb Shumyatsky and others, indicates that the difference between "normally cautious mice" and "bold mice" is one gene, which governs the protein stathmin in the amygdala. The ramifications for drug and even gene therapy are
|
| Vent Life? Not the O2 dependent part | 20 Nov 2005 04:23 GMT | 8 |
Vent colonies of today are not independent: "Many of the organisms in the vent colonies, especially those that live in the cooler zones a little distance away from the emerging fluid, use the oxygen that is dissolved
|
| The uncorrected simplifications/oversimplifications of Hamilton's Rule (Re: Removing Lewontin's Fallacy From Hamilton's Rule) | 18 Nov 2005 18:25 GMT | 2 |
name_and_address_supplied@hotmail.com wrote:_
> > > I understand the reasons for this mistrust. I share your opinion here. > > > The problem is that this derivation is straight from Price's theorem, > > > which says everything and nothing. |
| positive transmutation | 17 Nov 2005 20:58 GMT | 10 |
Hopefully someone here can help me out with a question I'm having a hard time finding the answer to. I know this is rudimentary but I couldn't find a beginner's forum, sorry. Can we change the DNA we pass on in positive ways? Smoking can cause
|
| Removing Lewontin's Fallacy From Hamilton's Rule | 17 Nov 2005 06:10 GMT | 10 |
Sociobiology, by focusing on sums of unweighted differences in individual genes rather than focusing on the differences in phylogenic correlation structure of genes, seems to be suffering from a kind of "Lewontin's Fallacy", as described by Edwards in his paper.
|
| GC content for heat protection or coding? | 16 Nov 2005 18:20 GMT | 2 |
Background: "Organisms can adjust the stability of their DNA by varying the proportions of the two kinds of base pairs, adenine-thymine, and guanine-cytosine. The GC pair
|
| Hamilton's Rule invalid? | 16 Nov 2005 18:20 GMT | 8 |
Hamilton's Rule invalid? Hamilton's Rule specifies when altruistic behavior is adaptive and is the cornerstone of kin selection theory. A new paper argues that it is invalid: Hamilton's rule, and the model of kin selection on which it is based, was
|
| Epigenetics | 14 Nov 2005 16:39 GMT | 1 |
I know you dont do human biology in here but I thought I would mention this TV programme in passing. Amazing... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/ghostgenes.shtml
|
| Article: A Single Cell Living 250 million Years | 14 Nov 2005 06:35 GMT | 1 |
A SINGLE CELL LIVING 250 MILLION YEARS? The following points are made by Christopher R. Brodie (American Scientist 2005 Nov-Dec): 1) What is the oldest living thing on Earth? A Madagascar radiated tortoise
|
| Hamilton's Rule: light at the end of a LONG tunnel? | 14 Nov 2005 06:35 GMT | 54 |
Multi-level selection Sean Rice Dept. of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Yale University :
|
| Bombardment Phase - Moon only? - One Scenario | 12 Nov 2005 17:29 GMT | 5 |
Many origin scenarios are stymied by the bombardment phase that builds up to a peak at 4.0, then drops off at 3.45 BYA . Yet David Darling writes that things may not be as they seem.
|