| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Questions for athiestic evoltionists | 28 Feb 2006 18:27 GMT | 15 |
Gday, I'm not here to flame, just after some non-'Intelligent Design' answers/reasoning (but yes I am a Christian) Wondering what is the evolutionary basis behind: 1) Sexual reproduction (as opposed to asexual)
|
| The better question - OOL | 27 Feb 2006 16:52 GMT | 1 |
OOL - Replication alone leads to Spiegelman monsters. Instead we should be asking what are we replicating? Metabolism alone demands some forced energy to start it up. For clues to the origin I suggest this question:
|
| Most Important Unsolved Problems? | 27 Feb 2006 05:53 GMT | 17 |
The articulation of unsolved problems has proven to be a great stimulus to focusing researchers' attention in other fields. I wonder what you think are the greatest unsolved problems in evolutionary biology?
|
| Minimization principal for evolution | 27 Feb 2006 05:53 GMT | 49 |
>From my intuitive understanding of physics it would seem to me that evolution should satisfy some sort of minimization principal (e.g. energy minimization). Has anybody ever come across such a principal?
|
| Questions about haplodiploids | 24 Feb 2006 16:45 GMT | 6 |
1. Are there any species in which the haploid sex is female? 2. Are there any species in which adult haploid males mate with multiple female partners? 3. Is there any evidence that haploid males are 'choosy' about
|
| Wachtershauser's Pop and Adapt | 24 Feb 2006 07:58 GMT | 6 |
Here is Gunter Wachtershauser's 'Pop and Adapt' OOL scenario. He first pops up metabolism which 'runs on its own' until it can adapt. It has the same failings as all Pop and Adapt scenarios (Pops out of nothing, no regard for the environment, has a magic cloak
|
| Spliceosomal introns | 24 Feb 2006 07:58 GMT | 9 |
Those interested in possible functions for at least some junk and those interested in alternative splicing will probably find much of interest here. Available free online with registration. I, unfortunately, haven't read it yet, since
|
| Perhaps a pointer to the language/throwing/upright-walking part of "punctuated" human evolution! | 23 Feb 2006 17:10 GMT | 2 |
http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/060221_unertanfrm.htm
|
| Prime Numbers in Evolution? | 22 Feb 2006 17:13 GMT | 2 |
I have been on the hunt for large exact numbers in biology. The largest one I have found is the 1,031 cells that are supposedly found in _every_ male C. elegans. I double checked and found that this number is prime. In sci.math I asked if anyone else had any large numbers from ...
|
| Sex and deleterious mutations | 22 Feb 2006 17:13 GMT | 9 |
Science 17 February 2006: Vol. 311. no. 5763, pp. 960 - 961 Perspectives EVOLUTION:
|
| "Evolutionary scam" | 22 Feb 2006 17:13 GMT | 3 |
Dear S.B.E. Readers: Obviously most on s.b.e. aren't scientists. However, somebody who was aware of that took it upon themselves to email me spam-scam. It's offensive because it mocks my intelligence. Furthermore, it is
|
| Dry Earwax and Sex Appeal | 22 Feb 2006 17:13 GMT | 6 |
Biospace Beat Ancient Mystery Solved - Dry Earwax Boosts Sex Appeal A GENETIC study of more than 3000 people worldwide has solved one of life's mysteries: why some people have dry earwax while others exude a
|
| The Fitness of MITOCHONDRIA | 21 Feb 2006 00:43 GMT | 1 |
"Perplexed in Peoria" jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net wrote:-
> Science 17 February 2006: > PiP comment: Say what? Sex results in a lower accumulation of > deleterious mutations in MITOCHONDRIAL genes? This I gotta read. |
| Monkey | 20 Feb 2006 18:55 GMT | 3 |
Posted on Wed, Dec. 07, 2005 Monkeys show gender differences in toy preferences, research findsBY ROBERT S. BOYDKnight Ridder NewspapersWASHINGTON - Just like human boys and girls, male monkeys like to play with toy cars while female monkeys
|
| human time to adulthood - beneficial for full brain development? | 19 Feb 2006 05:49 GMT | 3 |
>From a pure speculative standpoint, I would suppose that humans take more than a decade and a half to develop because our brain needs that long to become the powerful organ it is. Is there anthropological evidence that developing slower means being protected
|