| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Bombshell? | 14 Jul 2006 17:28 GMT | 15 |
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
> The idea that group selection (or multilevel selection) could have any > validity is sometimes dismissed in rather derogatory terms on this list. Group selection is generally dismissed for reasons that are
|
| Discussion at talk.origins | 13 Jul 2006 16:44 GMT | 7 |
I posted a theme here entitled "I Is complexity of evolutionary change explainable?" but it has been rejected because it has been understood to be Evolution/Creation discussion (I think it is not, just a question about the evolutionary process). Because I think I made some good
|
| Origin of Metamorphosis | 12 Jul 2006 04:16 GMT | 2 |
First off, I would like to state that I am a biochemist not a biologist and evolutionary biology is not my main field of activity. Anyway, this brings me to my first question. I was recently on answers.yahoo and someone asked about the origin of metamorphosis. I realized that in
|
| Intensity of selection | 11 Jul 2006 00:50 GMT | 13 |
Much of the debate on the Haldane/ReMine threads has focused on the notion of 'reproductive excess'. If reproductive excess is high, then ReMine's case is weakened - the number 1667 becomes a larger number. So there has been controversy over how
|
| Human Hyperevolution? | 10 Jul 2006 16:53 GMT | 24 |
The human animal seems to have developed mental faculties far in excess of what was required to survive on the African savanna a few million years ago. I'm curious what factors might have been responsible for such rapid evolution in so short a time.
|
| Paper: Human Imprinted Chromosomal Regions Are Historical Hot-Spots of Recombination | 09 Jul 2006 23:20 GMT | 1 |
Human Imprinted Chromosomal Regions Are Historical Hot-Spots of Recombination Ionel Sandovici, Sacha Kassovska-Bratinova, Joe E. Vaughan, Rae Stewart, Mark Leppert, Carmen Sapienza
|
| Re: Haldane's Dilemma - clarifications - and Felsenstein [LONG] | 09 Jul 2006 23:20 GMT | 9 |
"Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net>
>snip< > My comments in response to Malcolm appear in my other response. Here > I would like to ask ReMine a question: |
| Haldane's Dilemma - clarifications - and Felsenstein | 08 Jul 2006 05:05 GMT | 43 |
My paper, Cost Theory and the Cost of Substitution -- a clarification" is published, and available for free here: http://SaintPaulScience.com/CostTheory1.pdf The paper clarifies many long-standing confusions about the cost of
|
| Taking the Starch out of the Origin of Life | 08 Jul 2006 05:05 GMT | 4 |
For me the origin of life was simply like all evolution - it was what best survived and later was able to build in its environment. Energy forces changes in the chemistry of the earth.
|
| Re: Intensity of selection and the Price equation - continued(2) | 06 Jul 2006 18:52 GMT | 2 |
"Perplexed in Peoria" jimmenegay@sbcglobal.netwrote:-
>snip for brevity< > As an interesting aside, I note that it is possible to use a life > history profile to compute Var(W) using Edser's preferred definition |
| Evolutionary models and chaos | 06 Jul 2006 06:01 GMT | 2 |
I've been slogging my way through the later chapters of Sean Rice's excellent book "Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations". These chapters deal with the Price equation, quantitative genetics, and some rather bizarre stuff using tensors (a la relativity
|
| Convergent evolution and Intelligence | 06 Jul 2006 06:01 GMT | 5 |
Question for group, Is intelligence in different species convergent evolution? Ex. dolphins, chimps, humans and perhaps octupi. Tom Hendricks
|
| Haldane's Lemma | 06 Jul 2006 06:01 GMT | 6 |
Does Haldane's lemma take into account that chimps and ape's are both evolving, and that at some point and time they became reproductively incompatible? Would not having multiple species evolving increase the rate at which
|
| Re: Intensity of selection - Horsemen and storks | 03 Jul 2006 17:13 GMT | 1 |
"Perplexed in Peoria" jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net wrote:-
> I am trying to understand the logic which suggests that selection > coefficients must be additive, and looking for loopholes in that |
| Clue to Importance of Mother Child Bond in human development? | 02 Jul 2006 07:09 GMT | 2 |
>From Genome (p33-34), by Mat Ridley: "Females were getting big relative to males. Whereas in modern chimpanzees and australopithecines and the earliest ape-men fossils, males were one and a half times the size of females, in
|