Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Evolution / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Bombshell?14 Jul 2006 17:28 GMT15
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
> The idea that group selection (or multilevel selection) could have any
> validity is sometimes dismissed in rather derogatory terms on this list.
Group selection is generally dismissed for reasons that are
Discussion at talk.origins13 Jul 2006 16:44 GMT7
I posted a theme here entitled "I Is complexity of evolutionary change
explainable?" but it has been rejected because it has been understood
to be Evolution/Creation discussion (I think it is not, just a question
about the evolutionary process). Because I think I made some good
Origin of Metamorphosis12 Jul 2006 04:16 GMT2
First off, I would like to state that I am a biochemist not a biologist
and evolutionary biology is not my main field of activity. Anyway, this
brings me to my first question. I was recently on answers.yahoo and
someone asked about the origin of metamorphosis. I realized that in
Intensity of selection11 Jul 2006 00:50 GMT13
Much of the debate on the Haldane/ReMine threads has focused on
the notion of 'reproductive excess'.  If reproductive excess is
high, then ReMine's case is weakened - the number 1667 becomes
a larger number.  So there has been controversy over how
Human Hyperevolution?10 Jul 2006 16:53 GMT24
The human animal seems to have developed mental faculties far in excess of
what was required to survive on the African savanna a few million years ago.
I'm curious what factors might have been responsible for such  rapid
evolution in so short a time.
Paper: Human Imprinted Chromosomal Regions Are Historical Hot-Spots of Recombination09 Jul 2006 23:20 GMT1
Human Imprinted Chromosomal Regions Are Historical Hot-Spots of
Recombination
Ionel Sandovici, Sacha Kassovska-Bratinova, Joe E. Vaughan, Rae Stewart,
Mark Leppert, Carmen Sapienza
Re: Haldane's Dilemma - clarifications - and Felsenstein [LONG]09 Jul 2006 23:20 GMT9
"Perplexed in Peoria" <jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net>
>snip<
> My comments in response to Malcolm appear in my other response.  Here
> I would like to ask ReMine a question:
Haldane's Dilemma - clarifications - and Felsenstein08 Jul 2006 05:05 GMT43
My paper, Cost Theory and the Cost of Substitution -- a clarification"
is published, and available for free here:
http://SaintPaulScience.com/CostTheory1.pdf
The paper clarifies many long-standing confusions about the cost of
Taking the Starch out of the Origin of Life08 Jul 2006 05:05 GMT4
For me the origin of life was simply like all evolution -
it was what best survived and later was able to build
in its environment.
Energy forces changes in the chemistry of the earth.
Re: Intensity of selection and the Price equation - continued(2)06 Jul 2006 18:52 GMT2
"Perplexed in Peoria" jimmenegay@sbcglobal.netwrote:-
>snip for brevity<
> As an interesting aside, I note that it is possible to use a life
> history profile to compute Var(W) using Edser's preferred definition
Evolutionary models and chaos06 Jul 2006 06:01 GMT2
I've been slogging my way through the later chapters of Sean Rice's
excellent book "Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual
Foundations".  These chapters deal with the Price equation, quantitative
genetics, and some rather bizarre stuff using tensors (a la relativity
Convergent evolution and Intelligence06 Jul 2006 06:01 GMT5
Question for group,
Is intelligence in different species convergent evolution?
Ex. dolphins, chimps, humans and perhaps octupi.
Tom Hendricks
Haldane's Lemma06 Jul 2006 06:01 GMT6
Does Haldane's lemma take into account that chimps and ape's are both
evolving, and that at some point and time they became reproductively
incompatible?
Would not having multiple species evolving increase the rate at which
Re: Intensity of selection - Horsemen and storks03 Jul 2006 17:13 GMT1
"Perplexed in Peoria" jimmenegay@sbcglobal.net wrote:-

> I am trying to understand the logic which suggests that selection
> coefficients must be additive, and looking for loopholes in that
Clue to Importance of Mother Child Bond in human development?02 Jul 2006 07:09 GMT2
>From Genome (p33-34), by Mat Ridley:
"Females were getting big relative to males. Whereas in modern
chimpanzees and australopithecines and the earliest ape-men
fossils, males were one and a half times the size of females, in
Pages: 1 2 June, 2006
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.