| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Fusion progress? | 29 Oct 2003 00:51 GMT | 49 |
I'm interested in fusion but hardly an expert. What is the current status of fusion research? What do you all estimate as how many years until a self-sustaining fusion reaction is achieved that is sufficient for commercial energy production?
|
| Sun Spot Plasma Physics | 26 Oct 2003 08:16 GMT | 24 |
CC wrote:
> In article <3F8FC9B2.6010109@starpower.net>, Paul M Koloc > <xpmk@starpower.net> wrote: |
| Oregon High School Students Demonstrate Cold Fusion in Cambridge, MA | 22 Oct 2003 20:18 GMT | 8 |
Three excess heat experiments were shown in live demonstrations at ICCF10, including two on August 26, in a laboratory at MIT that was open to the public: A cell in a precision calorimeter was shown by Mitchell Swartz and
|
| Gordon, and all... Let's make a deal? | 21 Oct 2003 17:37 GMT | 4 |
> "...Never invoke conspiracy to explain that which can be understood > as being due to simple incompetence..." > > The simplest explanation is that they are attempting to index umpty-ump |
| How can i make a post request to remote server | 20 Oct 2003 20:42 GMT | 1 |
How can i make a POST request to remote http server inside Cold Fusion?
|
| CF and double beta | 20 Oct 2003 10:34 GMT | 2 |
The highest stable isotope of Paladium could be induced to disintegrate double beta with a 1.99 MeV peak energy. Now, I remember that some article has correlated "cold fusion events" with days of solar activity. Perhaps it was not a fool idea, after
|
| Cold Fussion ? They did it? Who? When? How? | 19 Oct 2003 18:22 GMT | 1 |
Cold fussion? Yuo know liek tis is step one of matter, thiis step two, thi sis sep three in that order, and I own it?, well yes! Like carefull entry windows into the atom at the right angles, at the
|
| LOOKING FOR OLD HP CALCULATORS | 15 Oct 2003 00:13 GMT | 1 |
I am looking for some old HP calculators like HP 41CV, HP 41CX, HP 71B, HP 15C, HP 16C, HP 67 and any others in the 1980's era...If you have one you would like to sell please email me at randyn@stangercorp.com...Thanks for your help...
|
| Dr. John Dash of PSU Discusses Replication of P&F Cold Fusion Experiments | 12 Oct 2003 07:17 GMT | 2 |
In March 1989, Pons and Fleischmann claimed that they were able to produce nuclear fusion by electrolysis of heavy water with a palladium cathode. Their main evidence for this claim was the production of excess heat which could not be explained by any known chemical
|
| What's up with Google Groups? | 09 Oct 2003 20:47 GMT | 15 |
Hey people what's up with Google's revised group index? sci.physics.fusion no longer shows up. Actually a whole lot of other groups have gone missing as well.
|
| look at Britz's plot | 09 Oct 2003 20:00 GMT | 55 |
here: http://www.chem.au.dk/~db/fusion/stats.html Assuming Brits has kept an uniform criterium during these years, I'd say the claims of resurrection are still slightly exagerated.
|
| Why Does the USPTO Continue to Deny the Existence of Cold Fusion? | 09 Oct 2003 03:59 GMT | 20 |
Why does the USPTO continue to deny the existence of Cold Fusion and continue to deny Cold Fusion patents when the U.S. Navy issued a report earlier this year stating that they believe, after a decade of secret research, that the Cold Fusion effect is real? That boggles
|
| U.S. Navy Cold Fusion Report February, 2002 | 07 Oct 2003 13:37 GMT | 6 |
U.S. Navy Report Supports Cold Fusion A new official report prepared by the U.S. Navy strongly supports cold fusion research and its funding: TECHNICAL REPORT 1862, February 2002
|
| Cmts. on Storms ICCF10 Paper - Letts Effect | 06 Oct 2003 13:19 GMT | 1 |
Comments on "Use of a very sensitive Seebeck calorimeter to study the Pons-Fleischmann and Letts Effects by Edmund Storms" presented at the 10th Int'l Conf. on Cold Fusion, held in Cambridge, Massachusetts 24 - 29 August 2003, by Dr. Edmund Storms (ES).
|
| Here Are the Two "Cold Fusion" Patents That Got By USPTO | 05 Oct 2003 21:29 GMT | 6 |
Interestingly, the USPTO caught on long ago to one particular favorite of enterprising but unwitting inventors which is neither novel, nonobvious, or reducible to practice: perpetual motion machines. Such devices can be patented only if working models are submitted and stand
|