| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| change is coming (maybe) | 31 May 2005 22:51 GMT | 2 |
The Bush administration proposing funding for other energy sources out of oil-and-gas money? Check out the OMB reaction to proposed energy and water act appropriations for next year at
|
| Bubble Fusion (sonofusion) | 28 May 2005 13:42 GMT | 4 |
Here's an article published in IEEE Spectrum magazine: http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/may05/0505sono.html This is from Taleyarkhan et al, on their acoustic inertial confinement approach to fusion. (ie. they're making bubbles in a coffee cup)
|
| The Mad Genius from the Bottom of the Sea | 28 May 2005 00:46 GMT | 6 |
The Mad Genius from the Bottom of the Sea: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.06/craven.html?pg=1&topic=craven&topic_set= Forget fusion, cold and hot. This old guy thinks we can provide unlimited energy, accelerate plant growth, generate drinking and
|
| MIT Cold Fusion Symposium Brief | 27 May 2005 22:49 GMT | 35 |
I attended the MIT Cold Fusion Symposium today. The main highlight was when Mitchell Schwartz mentioned an imminent commerical cold fusion development out of South Korea. Apparently a group there was granted a patent and Mitchell felt they were close to
|
| cold fusion - is it intelligent design? | 24 May 2005 17:41 GMT | 14 |
Cold fusion - is it intelligent design?
|
| Fresh Out of Ideas On Fusion | 24 May 2005 04:06 GMT | 2 |
It's a bad sign when I'm out of ideas. Bret Cahill
|
| No Fusion no future. | 23 May 2005 20:30 GMT | 21 |
One TV report says oil will be very short in 5 years with consequent very high prices. When the crunch comes I will not be one of the survivors, I will be 67 in five years. My life is almost over.
|
| Try To Beat This Easy Fusion Pipe Dream | 23 May 2005 20:21 GMT | 12 |
Instead of easy fusionists limiting themselves to heat and boilers and 41% efficiency Rankine cycle power plants, why don't they daydream about something better: A reaction where you can precisely aim high speed neutrons or other particles at an impulse turbine? No 2nd law
|
| Martians Forge Ahead with Nuclear Cold Fusion | 23 May 2005 18:11 GMT | 3 |
From: http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s5i8192 Martians Forge Ahead with Nuclear Cold Fusion Written by Noddy Bigears
|
| Here's Another Report on the MIT CF Conference | 23 May 2005 17:23 GMT | 1 |
A report on the MIT Cold Fusion Colloquium: The moderator of this gathering was Dr. Mitchell Swartz, a veteran cold fusion researcher. His doctoral dissertation at MIT, I was told, was in electrochemistry. He is also a medical doctor specializing in oncology.
|
| The Cold Fusion Mallove Unit | 23 May 2005 14:52 GMT | 3 |
A description of the Mallove unit, as proposed by Dr. Schwartz: The "Mallove" is a proposed unit to describe the height/width of the optimal operating points which appears to describe most (if not all) cold fusion systems and their products. The optimal operating points
|
| Nano Explosions Might Not Stay Nano | 21 May 2005 13:47 GMT | 6 |
Even if small scale hot fusion could be made to work there probably would be the same problem as anything that could be converted/increased for a large bomb. The only difference is this would fit into carry on baggage.
|
| "To Say Philosophy Hinges on Science . . . | 20 May 2005 05:03 GMT | 5 |
. . . is to stand Truth Herself on Her head." -- Nietzsche
|
| Any Work On Just One Or Two Fusions? | 20 May 2005 00:46 GMT | 29 |
They should be able to detect the one or two neutrons. Bret Cahill
|
| When will NIST fix their tables? | 19 May 2005 15:33 GMT | 6 |
Einstein's nine (9) primary fundamental universal base unit values 1) Einstein intensity: [(hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 9.8601020(30) x 10^-46 cd 2) Einstein time: (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s 3) Einstein length: (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m
|