Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Fusion / May 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
change is coming (maybe)31 May 2005 22:51 GMT2
The Bush administration proposing funding for other energy sources out
of oil-and-gas money?
Check out the OMB reaction to proposed energy and water act
appropriations for next year at
Bubble Fusion (sonofusion)28 May 2005 13:42 GMT4
Here's an article published in IEEE Spectrum magazine:
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/may05/0505sono.html
This is from Taleyarkhan et al, on their acoustic inertial confinement
approach to fusion. (ie. they're making bubbles in a coffee cup)
The Mad Genius from the Bottom of the Sea 28 May 2005 00:46 GMT6
The Mad Genius from the Bottom of the Sea:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.06/craven.html?pg=1&topic=craven&topic_set=
Forget fusion, cold and hot. This old guy thinks we can provide
unlimited energy, accelerate plant growth, generate drinking and
MIT Cold Fusion Symposium Brief27 May 2005 22:49 GMT35
I attended the MIT Cold Fusion Symposium today.
The main highlight was when Mitchell Schwartz mentioned an imminent
commerical cold fusion development out of South Korea.  Apparently a
group there was granted a patent and Mitchell felt they were close to
cold fusion - is it intelligent design?24 May 2005 17:41 GMT14
Cold fusion - is it intelligent design?
Fresh Out of Ideas On Fusion24 May 2005 04:06 GMT2
It's a bad sign when I'm out of ideas.
Bret Cahill
No Fusion no future.23 May 2005 20:30 GMT21
One TV report says oil will be very short in 5 years with consequent very
high prices.
When the crunch comes I will not be one of the survivors, I will be 67 in
five years.  My life is almost over.
Try To Beat This Easy Fusion Pipe Dream23 May 2005 20:21 GMT12
Instead of easy fusionists limiting themselves to heat and boilers and
41% efficiency Rankine cycle power plants, why don't they daydream
about something better:  A reaction where you can precisely aim high
speed neutrons or other particles at an impulse turbine?  No 2nd law
Martians Forge Ahead with Nuclear Cold Fusion23 May 2005 18:11 GMT3
From:
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s5i8192
Martians Forge Ahead with Nuclear Cold Fusion
Written by Noddy Bigears
Here's Another Report on the MIT CF Conference23 May 2005 17:23 GMT1
A report on the MIT Cold Fusion Colloquium:
The moderator of this gathering was Dr. Mitchell Swartz, a veteran cold
fusion researcher. His doctoral dissertation at MIT, I was told, was in
electrochemistry. He is also a medical doctor specializing in oncology.
The Cold Fusion Mallove Unit23 May 2005 14:52 GMT3
A description of the Mallove unit, as proposed by Dr. Schwartz:
The "Mallove" is a proposed unit to describe the height/width of the
optimal operating points which appears to describe most (if not all)
cold fusion systems and their products.  The optimal operating points
Nano Explosions Might Not Stay Nano21 May 2005 13:47 GMT6
Even if small scale hot fusion could be made to work there probably
would be the same problem as anything that could be converted/increased
for a large bomb.
The only difference is this would fit into carry on baggage.
"To Say Philosophy Hinges on Science . . .20 May 2005 05:03 GMT5
. . . is to stand Truth Herself on Her head."
-- Nietzsche
Any Work On Just One Or Two Fusions?20 May 2005 00:46 GMT29
They should be able to detect the one or two neutrons.
Bret Cahill
When will NIST fix their tables?19 May 2005 15:33 GMT6
Einstein's nine (9) primary fundamental universal base unit values
1) Einstein intensity: [(hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 9.8601020(30) x 10^-46 cd
2) Einstein time: (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s
3) Einstein length: (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m
Pages: 1 2 3 April, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.