Natural Science Forum / Physics / Fusion / July 2005

Here we are after 16 years of efforts on the part of people to prove
Cold Fusion.
Has anyone seen that water heater than Pons and Fleischman promised in
a couple of months from their 'startling' discovery?

I'm guessing just about every possible configuration has been tried but
is it possible to have the fission bomb in the center of a fusion
shell?
The fission explosion would compress the deuterium outward against the

Given the ole E=MC2 formula, how much mass is actually lost when an
atomic (No H-bombs, please) bomb is detonated.  For instance the
A-bombs used over Japan were about 20 Kt and not too efficent.  After
they were detonated, how much less "stuff" was left over?

On 6/2/05 2:53, in article mt2.0-31536-1117706019@hercules.herts.ac.uk,
"Rantrod" <rantrod@iwon.com> wrote:

Supposedly the only truly random events are in quantum mechanics.
Everything else is, if you had the time, knowable.  Just because
something has some ramdom aspects, however, doesn't necessarily mean it
is completely unpredictable.  If we could get an idea of what would

Dr. Ed Storms has posted the following to Vortex.  Response to follow.
---
Kirk Shanahan  {My opinions..noone else's}
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I wrote and sent several replies via Google posting to these newsgroups
in answer to a question raised about ITER. Whether someone has set up a
censor and jamming of my posts so that they do not reach the newsgroups
or whether Google posting is momentarily down, I do not know. So ...

In the news some nights previous from BBC it was mentioned that ITER is
to go ahead and to build the machine in France. One of the leading
scientists gave some sort of rationale as to why ITER will work. He
said that in the history of tokamaks that the size of 2 times larger

Found this on alt.environment.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oil and People
First published July 2005; article no. 573

I came across the following CF paper:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTneutronemi.pdf
I'm usually very wary of all the "excess heat" claims associated with CF
experiments, but this paper caught my eye. There are no claims of excess

Has anyone tried a tube of pressurised pure hydrogn containing a small wire
coil of palladium mounted so that it stands away from the wall.
?
I think the electrolytic cell is a red herring.

Would using an inert metal such as aluminum or copper in a heavy water
cell be a reasonable control cell for a cold fusion experiment?  It
seems like the perfect control to set up alongside a heavy water cell
with palladium that is supposedly responsible for the cold fusion