| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Emit detect Dirac ambient h*fL. | 29 Jan 2006 03:29 GMT | 1 |
$$ Emit detect Dirac ambient h*fL. $$ Note EMiTTER side 4*(pi)^2*Rx typo-CORRECTiON @ item 2 ..below. > Length is not an intrinsic physical property of the spaceship, > so asking whether it "PHYSICALLY increases or decreases" -=-
|
| ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor ? ) | 27 Jan 2006 12:42 GMT | 13 |
That is what the FAQ says, and that's also what I,ve learned when I studied physic. (@ DTU in DK) It says something else at the homepage of ITER: http://www.iter.org/index.htm
|
| USPTO Grants Patent for Perpetual Motion | 24 Jan 2006 21:23 GMT | 1 |
Search 6362718 at www.uspto.gov Supposedly Tesla ran a car 9 days without fuel in 1931. Bret Cahill
|
| The Experts Speak. | 24 Jan 2006 17:20 GMT | 68 |
Here, read some of these posts and threads to see just how much the "experts" here know about Meyer's circuit and how it works. http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=%22flyback+transformer%22&b tnG=Search&meta=group%3Dsci.energy.hydrogen
|
| The New Storms Challenge | 24 Jan 2006 14:42 GMT | 5 |
Ed Storms has written a Letter to Thermochimica Acta attempting to show that my theses regarding the calibration constant shift explanation of the Fleischmann-Pons-Hawkins Effect are impossible. This Letter is based on the shorter version that I posted here in the thread "New
|
| Gravity Vs inertia. | 19 Jan 2006 16:41 GMT | 1 |
$$ Gravity Vs inertia. Gravity works automatically at-a-distance ..inertia only by contact. Gravitational iMPULSE is applied per volume, inertial only per area. Gravitational iMPULSE is centro-symmetric ..inertial, only latteral.
|
| Fusion not essential to solve the energy problem? | 17 Jan 2006 12:17 GMT | 2 |
ENERGY - THE BIG PICTURE OVERVIEW The following is an attempt to put into perspective the problem of obtaining the world's energy needs by carbon free renewable means.
|
| Not a power reactor demonstration (ITER) ? | 15 Jan 2006 19:28 GMT | 1 |
Other things, that indicates that the production of Iter'nal energy has been left (forgotten)? * Not a 'Power Reactor' * Doesn't produce T (tritium) for itself.
|
| Mirror Machine Director? | 15 Jan 2006 19:16 GMT | 10 |
Who is in charge of America's mirror machine program these days?
|
| Any SPACE where a PARTiCLE is, is DiSCRETE; [Whether it's "falling" or, NOT falling.!!] ```Brian. | 11 Jan 2006 21:28 GMT | 1 |
$$ Any SPACE where a PARTiCLE is, is DiSCRETE; [Whether it's "falling" or, NOT falling.!!] ```Brian.
|
| cold fusion: Hutchison effect | 10 Jan 2006 22:28 GMT | 2 |
http://members.fortunecity.com/reactor1967/coldfusion.jpg Don,t hear much about this anymore.
|
| My BiGGER bang.!! | 09 Jan 2006 19:17 GMT | 1 |
PART A: My IT PERCEPT-tron. [BiGGER.wpd]; Time 03:14iPMsun01jan2006.. ..edited Ni, etc. [nL*(h + nA*hbar)/sec=nL*Ni*h/sec=nL*Ni*Qx*J/10^25*("e")^4]. GUESS general Planck Stefan Boltzmann Stuckless PHOTOenergy:
|
| Any Conventional Fusion Judgements? | 06 Jan 2006 13:14 GMT | 1 |
I last was looking into it in the late 90's and at that time fusion power looked to me as if it would never become practical. At that time it appeared that the cost and control of a generator would require such a huge investment that it would only pay off if it was
|
| Neutron generator efficency required to be a profileration hazard? | 02 Jan 2006 18:33 GMT | 3 |
Quick query, how efficient does a (say D-T) fusion neutron generator have to be before it becomes a viable means of breeding Pu239 from U238 for a weapons programme? Obviously for this application the competition is a fission reactor which
|