Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Fusion / April 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Cold fusion is extremly trivial!28 Apr 2007 04:44 GMT2
You just need to build a micro solar system with a mini-sun
in the middle. Then you have to create a micro nova to
turn the mini-sun into a micro black hole.
Fine Structure Constant28 Apr 2007 04:26 GMT3
Further to the analytic expression for the mass of the photon, this
work has been extended to include a theoretical rationale for the
fine
structure constant. At this point, three fundamental physical
Polywell17 Apr 2007 17:11 GMT2
Where's the newest info on this stuff?
Jim
collection of links and references on Polywell fusion09 Apr 2007 04:24 GMT3
I'm collecting what I hope to be a comprehensive set of web pages that
relate to Dr. Robert Bussard's "Polywell" approach to IEC fusion:
 <http://www.strout.net/info/science/polywell/index.html>
If you have any additions or corrections to suggest, please send me
The Nazis already had cold fusion!!!07 Apr 2007 12:29 GMT2
The world was just afraid of the superior scientific knowledge
of Germany, so they started World War II.
This wasn't good for mankind. We barely made it to the moon.
my experience of the fusion reactor we built in 197002 Apr 2007 20:20 GMT4
After I wandered out of the appleton lab I wandered into the navel dockyard
just next door to my university where I got me degree and asked if they
would like a fusion rector like the one we just made at work that blew up
and just after we done it we got banged on the head and ...
Cold fusion discovered02 Apr 2007 19:28 GMT1
Unfortunately, it will only work today.
Do you know why?
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.02 Apr 2007 06:40 GMT2
The main argument to oppose this theory is to claim that the magnetic
fields in the galaxy are too weak to provide the sun with sufficient
enrgy. To reply to this argument I did some calculations which are
found in the pdf file below in the section:
I think we should NOT discover cold fusion!02 Apr 2007 05:47 GMT1
Cold fusion is really pretty simple to achieve. BUT, if this was
discovered,mankind would nuke itself withing a matter of days.
AND if that was not enough, it would also attract aliens from outer
Chop ya brain out chop!01 Apr 2007 05:48 GMT1
After I wandered out of the Appleton lab I wandered into the navel dockyard
just next door to my university where I got me degree (Portsmouth 1969) and
asked if they would like a fusion rector like the one we just made at work
that blew up and just after we done it we got banged ...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.