| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| anti gravity | 31 May 2004 19:45 GMT | 1 |
For the open minded: Since gravity = static elctromagnetic field, anti-gravity = reversed static elctromagnetic field. (e.g. levitated frog)
|
| gravity and light | 30 May 2004 14:28 GMT | 6 |
For the open minded: gravity waves = electromagnetic waves gravity field = static electromagnetic field in the 5th dimension.
|
| mass | 27 May 2004 22:07 GMT | 2 |
For the open minded: Mass does not bend spacetime, mass is the curvature itself, which is a ripple in 5 dimensions.
|
| Retic Postings and SPAM | 26 May 2004 21:30 GMT | 1 |
Retic Postings and SPAM There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H. E. Retic are SPAM. The writer’s postings are carefully constructed so as remain within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:
|
| How's that cat doing? (no peeking) | 26 May 2004 21:03 GMT | 13 |
I would be grateful if those of you who have formed a view about superposition, could say whether the cat in Schroedinger's death box can be alive and dead at the same time.
|
| A Snapshot of a Photon | 26 May 2004 19:53 GMT | 3 |
A Snapshot of a Photon The photon has been viewed as a somewhat mysterious entity which sometimes has the properties of a particle and sometimes has the properties oaf a wave. It would seem interesting to see, therefore, whether we can determine
|
| Why is Universe accelerating ? | 25 May 2004 13:06 GMT | 6 |
If one uses the logic of gravity, it would be consistent to believe that the expanding universe (and obviously its galaxies) are being drawn by a stronger gravitational force from *elsewhere*. Where this "elsewhere" is, I haven't a clue (perhaps another brane?)
|
| The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics | 23 May 2004 11:45 GMT | 1 |
The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics Observations made in the field of Quantum Physics have already established that the concept that space and time are different aspects of the same entity - "space-time" is flawed. This concept was based on the recognition that ...
|
| Breakthrough in Cosmology | 22 May 2004 13:31 GMT | 1 |
As you may know in light of the big bang paradigm's explanatory impotence many physicists claim, including Leonard Susskind of Stanford University and his colleagues, that the contemporary theoretical view of the Universe is so unlikely that it must be logically flowed, and ...
|
| Natural Gravity Shields | 22 May 2004 06:46 GMT | 14 |
This could change everything. http://www.magma.ca/~week/
|
| Getting more Gravity for a punch. | 22 May 2004 01:00 GMT | 2 |
When Gravity is measured its generally the effect that that needs to be quantified. Forget the constant and the prediction and the inevitable result for the moment.
|
| Do Virtual Photons Exist? | 20 May 2004 15:53 GMT | 1 |
Do Virtual Photons Exist? The Aether was original conceived as a means of explaining "forces acting at a distance" (i.e.- electric, magnetic, gravitation, et al). When the idea of the classical Aether was abandoned early in the century, there was a need to
|
| The Nature of Mass | 19 May 2004 04:57 GMT | 3 |
The Nature of Mass We have all been taught in our physics classes that mass is one of the fundamental entities of our reality and that all of the effects occurring in our Universe are dependent on interactions between masses. It behooves us then
|
| The Nature of Mass | 19 May 2004 04:56 GMT | 8 |
The Nature of Mass We have all been taught in our physics classes that mass is one of the fundamental entities of our reality and that all of the effects occurring in our Universe are dependent on interactions between masses. It behooves us then
|
| new aether molecule idea | 19 May 2004 01:07 GMT | 7 |
This idea originated from a thread in sci.physics.relativity "aether... (photon gas)". Here it is: First, some definitions to avoid confusion: aether atom - this is something like a very small ball
|