| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Can Solid Mercury be Magnetized? | 18 May 2004 17:36 GMT | 3 |
I know liquid mercury is a very good conductor of electricity. Could solid mercury be made magnetic? Bert
|
| Modern Physics Letters A - Vol. 19, No. 17 | 17 May 2004 13:27 GMT | 2 |
Modern Physics Letters A Vol. 19, No. 17 (7 June 2004) View table-of-contents and abstracts at http://www.worldscinet.com/mpla/19/1917/S02177323041917.html
|
| New theory for expanding Universe | 16 May 2004 16:07 GMT | 16 |
Hello, I'm a newbie (crackpot if you like) and I don't know if this theory already exists. Anyways, in short, I propose that: The expansion of the universe, big bang and big crunch are natural
|
| Relitivistic Universal Law ? | 16 May 2004 02:06 GMT | 4 |
Hiyas :), Following up on John Schoenfield's idea I have a new modification which I propose is a relativistic correction to Newtons's Universal Law of Gravitation -
|
| Hlep with circuit design | 15 May 2004 06:30 GMT | 2 |
Yes, I mistyped the subject line as a search aid. That being said, wondered if I could get some help selecting the values of the components of a simple little project. I want to take house line, run it through a full bridge, filter it a little and use the dc to run a series set up
|
| Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? | 13 May 2004 23:28 GMT | 5 |
Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion? "The Einstein Hoax", and its related texts, were written because post-Einstein physics has been degraded from a science which relies on the proper use of the "Rules of Evidence" and the "Rules of Logic" into a religion
|
| Farthest Quazars...? | 13 May 2004 21:10 GMT | 1 |
 Signature hi hi hi...!!! The Farthest Quasers(?) are judged to me soemthing like 14.6 Billion light years away, meaning that the universe is
|
| Are Photons poor swimmers? | 12 May 2004 22:41 GMT | 2 |
 Signature hi hi hi...!!! Why don't Photons ( & Electrons, et. al. ) travel at the speed of infinity?
|
| 311 trillion years! | 12 May 2004 15:10 GMT | 3 |
According to Vedic ("hindu") literature the lifetime of a Universe is 311 trillion years. Is it perhaps too much? : D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedic_timekeeping
|
| warped , pitted and streched space time... | 11 May 2004 22:36 GMT | 2 |
hey ever notice how einstein space time warp is usually warped by compression of mass? a little suspect:? why then by analogy çant we have then have space time elasticity and tension as well? its funny in the theory thus how the analogy of mass being like weight
|
| General Relativity Examined | 08 May 2004 21:52 GMT | 3 |
General Relativity Examined In 1915 Dr. Einstein published the General Theory of Relativity. It accepted the Principle of Relativity (the laws and constants of the Science of Physics were the same in all reference frames) as a postulate (upon which
|
| new theories abound | 07 May 2004 15:10 GMT | 1 |
but are any of them really new?
|
| Graviton Stars | 06 May 2004 02:50 GMT | 4 |
We call stars that only have neutrons "neutron stars" Gravities great pressure has forced the electrons back into the proton,and recreated the neutron. Now if gravities force becomes three times greater my theory has the quarks,gluons,and electrons squeezed and it becomes the
|
| Time is an illusion | 05 May 2004 17:32 GMT | 21 |
I seem to remember reading somewhere that time could just be an illusion. Things now just *are*. There is no such possibility of time travel. It has been created by us to explain processes and events as they
|
| Are Gravitons Blackholes? | 05 May 2004 14:10 GMT | 13 |
Gravitons would have to be blackholes because they are so very heavy. In tons they weigh 1 with 39 zeros after it,and their size is a centimeter divided by 1 with 33 zeros after it. A graviton in the micro realm is equivalent to a blackhole in the macro realm. Here
|