| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Cycles Research Institute | 11 Oct 2004 08:51 GMT | 1 |
Announcing the formation of "Cycles Research Institute" ======================================================= For the interdisciplinary study of cycles see http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org
|
| I figured out how gravity works | 10 Oct 2004 22:33 GMT | 11 |
Yeah, I did. Please read my paper The Mechanical Energy Formula Is Backwards on my web page http://www.danielzimmer.com/ Thanks.
|
| Retic Postings and SPAM | 10 Oct 2004 21:22 GMT | 2 |
Retic Postings and SPAM There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H. E. Retic are SPAM. The writer’s postings are carefully constructed so as remain within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:
|
| the Moron is back with another | 10 Oct 2004 11:05 GMT | 5 |
First I would like to thank those of you who replied to my earlier post. Your ensuing discussion made me feel only 9/10 dumb. Now I have one more question. At NASAs site the descriptive for Hubbels deep space pictures says (paraphrasing here) that these photos allow
|
| What and where is before the creation of everything? | 10 Oct 2004 08:02 GMT | 22 |
Where is this place and what is it before the Big Bang? If it was just mass in a very very very small place just ready to explode in matter of seconds, what is the surrounding? What was this singularity? What created it? And what created it before it
|
| Light/Blackholes | 09 Oct 2004 21:22 GMT | 1 |
If light is so fast why can't it from escape black holes. Is there anything that can escape from black holes? If nothing can escape black holes. how come there is always "space" Is Space reproducing? Haha.
|
| Just jacks &... | 08 Oct 2004 20:00 GMT | 5 |
...and air-bourne ball, Or merely pick-up sticks? \\|\\***o Sparkles cast en pointe ~
|
| Accepted black hole theory condradicts accepted physics | 08 Oct 2004 02:55 GMT | 5 |
The current accepted theory of a black hole is NOT consistent with current accepted physics. Here are the problems; 1) All accepted calculations of gravitational pull are based upon mass and the distance between two objects. It is not based upon the density or
|
| Morphic field... | 06 Oct 2004 22:44 GMT | 3 |
...enfoled potential, Though not always realized into stable form. As anyone who has ambulated in quantam foam knows. I am Blue Dog.
|
| The Physics Laws Are Changed By The Smart Model and The Free Will Choice Universal Model | 02 Oct 2004 16:16 GMT | 3 |
The Physics Laws Are Changed By The Smart Model and The Free Will Choice Universal Model -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
|
| Summatory of the cinetic energy of | 02 Oct 2004 04:05 GMT | 1 |
Has anyone dare to calculate the summatory of the cinetic energy of universe? Every particle in universe has a certain amount of cinnetic ennergy, from subatomic particles to panets, stars or galaxies.
|
| new equasion bridges the gaps between Enstien and Newton | 01 Oct 2004 19:40 GMT | 1 |
A new unified theory called Dynamic Dimensional Distinction (3XD) was released this week. It successfully bridges the gaps between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity without contradiction. It also bridges gravitational theories / laws. It states the following :
|
| Holohgrapich Univers | 01 Oct 2004 19:00 GMT | 4 |
Is it possible that our Univer is just a holographic projection???
|
| no such thing as a silly question | 01 Oct 2004 12:10 GMT | 1 |
If you cant see light , for what ever reason, its to dam fast, its a wave , its a particle,. what am i actually seeing when i look at an object.? does the light wave /particle make whatever im looking at glow, in that
|