Natural Science Forum / Physics / New Theories / July 2007

I'm not student or professional in the area just found it
interesting ...
I've read in some old news:
According to the researchers, the main part of the light pulse leaves

"The Error in Relativistic Physics"
    The Science of Physics is based upon the making of measurements. What
can be measured is taken as being "true". This is an excellent philosophy,
but unfortunately the addition of the concepts of relativity into science

I had a gallon plastic jug of distilled water, with the water level about
up to the bottom edge of the label. I slid the bottle forward on the kitchen
counter, and I was surprised when it then scooted forward some more. The
harder I pushed it, the further it then scooted.

Researchers at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) have
developed an inexpensive solar cell that can be painted or printed on
flexible plastic sheets
http://theanalystmagazine.com/pr/g158.htm

Proof Of Evolution.
On Jul 15, 2:36 am, Pastor Dave
<no...@nowhere.com> wrote to someone:

I think that the question you're asking is not whether there are rules in
nature, but why do we call them 'rules'. I think that it's just a
matter of semantics. You can always substitute rule for other words like,
processes of nature, natural progressive path, etc.

4>
                      Pluto Was A MOON of NEPTUNE
              Pluto's present solar orbit CROSSES Neptune's solar
         orbit in TWO places.  From 1979 to 1999, Pluto was

Posted this morning at Electric Politics, an interview with Dr. Edgar
Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut and the sixth man to walk on the moon.
Dr. Mitchell talks about space, NASA, UFOs (including the Roswell
incident, which he believes was real), and consciousness and what he

"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
    Cosmological observations have recently indicated that the "expansion"
of the universe to be faster at extreme distances than it is over most of
its observable volume. There have been attempts to reconcile ...

"For many years I've occasionally considered the release of at least
some of the material I possess, but the recent wave of photos and
sightings has prompted me to cut to the chase and do so now": exerpt.
http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/

"Quantum Theory vs General Relativity"
"The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
    The General Relativity Theory and Quantum Theory are two fundamental
theories accepted by modern physics. The former theory deals with the very

People:  Check this one out, Either the writer is on to something or
completely out of it. I think it is worth looking at. Article title
that I am referring to  is "Motion in a matrix as a new theory of the
physical universe," on www.helium.com.  Essentiallly the view that is

"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
    When the writer first started to investigate General Relativity about
four decades ago, he was quite startled to learn that the results were
incompatible with the Principle of Equivalence and where therefore

"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
    Modern physics seems to be searching for ways to incorporate all
physical phenomena into a single unified theory. The question that comes to
mind is why? The question arises as to the conceptual need for such an

There is no dark energy holding galaxies together. It is their
accelerating motion that gives them added inertia. Inertia and gravity
are the same force. GR tells us accelerating motion and gravity are
equivalent.  bert