Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / New Theories / June 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a  TOE.29 Jun 2008 01:28 GMT1
Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a  TOE.
Something SMALL is wrong with physics if we look at the Hubble images
of our universe. This and other anomalies described in the book are a
firm reason to suggest a Higgs-Black hole nucleus PARADIGM SHIFT,
Everyone It seems is into this27 Jun 2008 10:13 GMT1
This string caught my attention because recently it is pretty much
what everyone is talking about. The comments here are good and I found
myself reading through a lot longer than I expected to because I guess
I've personally felt the effects of this fuel crunch myself but
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"24 Jun 2008 18:09 GMT1
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
    The validity of the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics seems to be
beyond question. Under the first law, the total energy content of a closed
system must remain constant. Under the second law, the availability of ...
"Is There a Force of Gravity?"23 Jun 2008 22:18 GMT3
"Is There a Force of Gravity?"
    In undergraduate physics, the Newtonian concept of an attractive force
between masses that is proportional to the product of the masses divided by
the square of their separation is taught. When one advances to the more
No Atheist Can Answer It17 Jun 2008 08:35 GMT24
Humans came on earth about ten-thousand years ago. I recommend to keep
off the high-school education bias, and then read on.
Earth is about 4.5-billion years old, as uranium-dating proves.
Reason 1: Humans are clever, they don't take tens of thousands of
Yep, it is an impossibility!09 Jun 2008 21:03 GMT238
Roger Penrose , a man with impressive edcuation, and an impressive career.
Shows how impossible it is for the universe, earth and manking to form
itself after a big bang explosion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.