| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Black Hole & Gravity | 29 Feb 2004 07:25 GMT | 4 |
As we now know that Gravity has speed and it is transmitted, which states that it is made of some thing we don't know (gravitons perhaps), , So why doesn't the Black hole eats up the gravity the very thing he causes Sounds foolish , the feeling is mutual
|
| Looking for PMT/PAD with good cosmic ray rejection | 25 Feb 2004 22:59 GMT | 6 |
We're conducting an experiment using photon counting with a cooled PMT at altitude. We find that our counting statistics are skewed by background cosmic rays at altitude and I'm wondering if there isn't a way to get better rejection of CR counts using better Amp
|
| A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all @ www.speedypc.20m.com | 25 Feb 2004 08:30 GMT | 4 |
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all @ www.speedypc.20m.com
|
| Magnetism as relativistic electrostatic | 21 Feb 2004 08:56 GMT | 2 |
Ken S. Tucker <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote
>>...The 'constitution' of SP research rejects speculation and thus a >> theoretician adding page 40,001 to the body of knowledge, is by the same set
|
| strings | 20 Feb 2004 17:53 GMT | 19 |
String Theory String theory started as a simple way of modelling the characteristics of elementary particles as the result wave movement on a tiny circular string so that the various quantum states that produce particles are dependant on the number of standing waves around this ...
|
| Is There a Force of Gravity? | 20 Feb 2004 09:28 GMT | 1 |
Is There a Force of Gravity? In undergraduate physics, the Newtonian concept of an attractive force between masses that is proportional to the product of the masses divided by the square of their separation is taught. When one advances to the more advanced
|
| Dimensions of color charge? | 20 Feb 2004 01:44 GMT | 57 |
Folks, In cgs units, what is the dimensions of color charge between quarks? FrediFizzx
|
| beyond Albert Einstein's general relativity | 19 Feb 2004 17:50 GMT | 2 |
Peter's UNIFIED PHYSICS theory at http://relativity.topcities.com/revolution.htm THANKS! IF YOU WANT TO PUT AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS INTO MY ACCOUNT: the swift code is METWAU4B, the beneficiary name is SUNCORP LTD,
|
| The Error in Relativistic Physics | 19 Feb 2004 10:14 GMT | 1 |
The Error in Relativistic Physics The Science of Physics is based upon the making of measurements. What can be measured is taken as being "true". This is an excellent philosophy, but unfortunately the addition of the concepts of relativity into science has
|
| The Nature Of Light | 19 Feb 2004 08:48 GMT | 13 |
The nature of light is in its name. It is C squared Lighter than matter. Mitch Raemsch -- Time moves forward in all directions --
|
| Are fermionic spinors null? | 18 Feb 2004 12:24 GMT | 4 |
Having hacked my way through numerous sources on spinors, especially Misner Thorne and Wheeler, and parts of Cartan's classic, plus QM books, I'm particularly puzzled on one point: Spinors parameterising the light-cone are null (scalar product with
|
| Electron | 17 Feb 2004 17:32 GMT | 12 |
A Newbie was asking me, Why do electron move around nucleus, any idea??
|
| Re: Magnetism as relativistic electrostatics. [rejected from sci.physics.research] | 16 Feb 2004 19:55 GMT | 6 |
This article was rejected from sci.physics.research. Please refer to the thread "Magnetism as relativistic electrostatics." in sci.physics.research if you need help following it. My article follows the rejection notice.
|
| Solution | 16 Feb 2004 17:40 GMT | 1 |
Solution In quantum field theory, the formalism of the Standard Model, space-time is only a background in which particles exist and interact. In General Relativity, space-time is continuous. In the QST model,
|
| Three Particle Generations | 16 Feb 2004 13:56 GMT | 10 |
I recall reading somewhere that there is a good reason why there can only be three particle generations. What was the reason? I seem to have forgotten. FrediFizzx
|