Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / February 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Black Hole & Gravity29 Feb 2004 07:25 GMT4
As we now know that Gravity has speed and it is transmitted, which states
that it is made of some thing we don't know (gravitons perhaps),
, So why doesn't the Black hole eats up the gravity the very thing he causes
Sounds foolish , the feeling is mutual
Looking for PMT/PAD with good cosmic ray rejection25 Feb 2004 22:59 GMT6
We're conducting an experiment using photon counting with a cooled PMT
at altitude. We find that our counting statistics are skewed by
background cosmic rays at altitude and I'm wondering if there isn't a
way to get better rejection of CR counts using better Amp
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all @ www.speedypc.20m.com25 Feb 2004 08:30 GMT4
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all @ www.speedypc.20m.com
Magnetism as relativistic electrostatic21 Feb 2004 08:56 GMT2
Ken S. Tucker <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote
>>...The 'constitution' of SP research rejects speculation and thus a
       >> theoretician adding page 40,001 to the body of knowledge,
is by the same set
strings20 Feb 2004 17:53 GMT19
String Theory
String theory started as a simple way of modelling the characteristics of elementary particles as the result wave movement on a tiny circular string so that the various quantum states that produce particles are dependant on
the number of standing waves around this ...
Is There a Force of Gravity?20 Feb 2004 09:28 GMT1
Is There a Force of Gravity?
    In undergraduate physics, the Newtonian concept of an attractive force
between masses that is proportional to the product of the masses divided by the
square of their separation is taught. When one advances to the more advanced
Dimensions of color charge?20 Feb 2004 01:44 GMT57
Folks,
In cgs units, what is the dimensions of color charge between quarks?
FrediFizzx
beyond Albert Einstein's general relativity19 Feb 2004 17:50 GMT2
Peter's UNIFIED PHYSICS theory at
http://relativity.topcities.com/revolution.htm
THANKS! IF YOU WANT TO PUT AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS INTO MY ACCOUNT: the
swift code is METWAU4B, the beneficiary name is SUNCORP LTD,
The Error in Relativistic Physics19 Feb 2004 10:14 GMT1
The Error in Relativistic Physics
    The Science of Physics is based upon the making of measurements. What can
be measured is taken as being "true". This is an excellent philosophy, but
unfortunately the addition of the concepts of relativity into science has
The Nature Of  Light19 Feb 2004 08:48 GMT13
The nature of light is in its name.
It is C squared Lighter than matter.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Time moves forward in all directions --
Are fermionic spinors null?18 Feb 2004 12:24 GMT4
Having hacked my way through numerous sources on spinors, especially
Misner Thorne and Wheeler, and parts of Cartan's classic, plus QM
books, I'm particularly puzzled on one point:
Spinors parameterising the light-cone are null (scalar product with
Electron17 Feb 2004 17:32 GMT12
A Newbie was asking  me, Why do electron move around nucleus,
any idea??
Re: Magnetism as relativistic electrostatics. [rejected from sci.physics.research]16 Feb 2004 19:55 GMT6
This article was rejected from sci.physics.research. Please refer to the
thread "Magnetism as relativistic electrostatics." in
sci.physics.research if you need help following it. My article follows
the rejection notice.
Solution16 Feb 2004 17:40 GMT1
Solution
In quantum field theory, the formalism of the Standard Model,
space-time is only a background in which particles exist and interact.
In General Relativity, space-time is continuous. In the QST model,
Three Particle Generations16 Feb 2004 13:56 GMT10
I recall reading somewhere that there is a good reason why there can only be
three particle generations.  What was the reason?  I seem to have forgotten.
FrediFizzx
Pages: 1 2 January, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.