| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Measuring Our Absolute Velocity | 16 Feb 2004 06:44 GMT | 1 |
Measuring Our Absolute Velocity In the 19th century, science had concluded that reality was based upon the Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. The Aether was required to account for the ability of forces (electric, magnetic, gravitational, etc.) to
|
| Theoretical Construct for Entangled Particles | 15 Feb 2004 18:34 GMT | 1 |
A theoretical construct to explain entangled particle observations: Entangled particles seem to pose a major problem for modern physics. If such particles are placed a distance apart but yet react instantaneously when the companion particle is acted upon, it would
|
| Entangled Particles | 15 Feb 2004 18:32 GMT | 1 |
Entangled particles pose a major problem for modern physics. If such particles are placed a distance apart but yet react instantaneously when the companion particle is acted upon, it would suggest that information is being transferred faster than the speed of
|
| What is the role group theory in Quantum Field Theory? | 15 Feb 2004 18:29 GMT | 1 |
I found one role of group theory was to classfy the particles. For example, we know elecron field is transformed in spinor representation, and so on. But, I wonder what other role the group theory is doing in quantum
|
| Examining Mathematical Approaches | 15 Feb 2004 07:25 GMT | 1 |
Examining Mathematical Approaches I have received communication from a mathematician who asserted that my statements about the validity of non-Euclidean Geometry were erroneous. He apparently objected to the assertion that the definition of a straight line was
|
| Qabala & Physics | 10 Feb 2004 15:20 GMT | 1 |
The Others as The Ecclesia (see also Herman Hesse's "Magister Ludi" (AKA "The Glass Bead Game'). Thanks Tony I will cite you on this in the book. :-) Before I forget to Paul Zielinski - the Cartan spin connection valued in
|
| Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics | 08 Feb 2004 03:57 GMT | 8 |
I was wondering if an expert in quantum physics can clarify a couple of things for me. I read this in the Wikipedia: --
|
| The second Porat Postulate | 05 Feb 2004 07:43 GMT | 75 |
The second porat Pstulate was published here before and here it is again: 'There is in nature some basic particle *that moves **naturally** in a closed circle
|
| Hermiticity of Lagrangian | 01 Feb 2004 23:12 GMT | 2 |
in books about QFT I always see "+ h.c." at the end of Lagrangians. Although I always took it for granted I just start to ask myself why actually do you want the Lagrangian to be hermitian. What follows physically from imposing hermicity? I have heard that it ensures real
|