Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / August 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Question on observer's role in QM31 Aug 2004 12:53 GMT4
Quantum theory states that observation crates a relaity. i.e. Quantum
object is represented by its wave function until some one looks at
it.At that time, wave function representing an object collapses and
quantum object [i.e. photon,electron etc) takes definite state.
511 kev line - why not 1022 kev?30 Aug 2004 16:10 GMT7
When an electron and a positron annihilate, one speaks of the 511 kev peak.
But a mass equal to 1022 kev gets destroyed, so i am wondering why we see a
peak at 511 kev?
why general relativity is non-linear30 Aug 2004 11:05 GMT1
The gravitational force is caused by spin 2 force carriers.
When these interact with vacuum particles and protons and electrons
they become fermions with positive and negative electric charges.
Gravity is a pushing force caused by the spin 2 carriers and
de broglie and electron transitions caused by dark energy29 Aug 2004 18:06 GMT2
Is it possible that electron transitions from a high energy state to a
low energy state are caused by the electrons interacting with some
other partilces in the space around atoms.Let's look at the case of a
hydrogen atom:
Progress in Tapping Zero Point Energy for Space Exploration29 Aug 2004 13:08 GMT2
On Aug 27, 2004, at 3:53 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
PS I should make it clear that this latest paper by Hal Puthoff is a
GOOD paper! It is very useful. Good references and it shows WHY Hal's
approach here is wrong. It is wrong because it is incomplete not because
CP Violation28 Aug 2004 16:44 GMT4
I'm doing a little research on CP Violation at the moment and was
wondering if anyone has any simple explanations of the phenomena.
Thanks,
Aidan
stupid question about the "delta minus" particle28 Aug 2004 15:28 GMT2
I know naught of which I speak, but I enjoy following the field.  I
don't know any of the math but I think I have a decent conceptual
understanding, for a layman.
A while back I was thinking about a baryon composed of three down
Experimental Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant28 Aug 2004 08:20 GMT1
Anyone know of a good, solid reference for hydrogen's experimental, observed
value of its Rydberg constant or its ground state binding energy?
Thanks for the info,
Steve Bell
Experimental Verification of Quarks27 Aug 2004 17:44 GMT12
After quarks have been discovered, are there any experiments also able to
verify the fractional charge associated with each type of quarks?  Or is
that the fractional charge theoretically established?
Does any one know how the three quarks made up a proton are arranged
Gas in a vacuum26 Aug 2004 23:08 GMT3
If a bubble of  lets say Helium was released into space, would it stay as a
bubble or disperse into particles
CERN ALICE Large Hadron Collider to accidentally destroy life on the planet?26 Aug 2004 17:03 GMT8
This message is posted by a concerned physicist, not at all a Luddite,
and I think the human species and other life on Earth should get an
answer before the curious cats among us produce a "mini Big Bang"
anywhere in this part of the universe, like is being planned for 2007
Electrical resistivity of Au question.26 Aug 2004 13:14 GMT1
Given that the electrical resistivity of
Cu is 1.7 micro ohm cm and the bigger atom
Ag is 1.6 micro ohm cm, why is still bigger atom
Au 2.2 micro ohm cm?  Is this a effect from the larger
SMITHSONIAN Even Lies to Congressmen...25 Aug 2004 19:47 GMT1
>  SMITHSONIAN'S LETTER TO U.S. CONGRESSMAN
LIGHT & MATTER-TWO MODES OF THE SAME THING.25 Aug 2004 07:37 GMT5
We have electrostatic fields -- and static magnetic fields.
What if the two pair up in a symbiotic relationship -- like
people, the farmer takes a wife.
We could call this pair an electromagnetic field. My, my,
de Broglie wave paradox?24 Aug 2004 17:57 GMT10
In chap 1, page 31, of "Quantum Chemistry" (McQuarrie, 1983,
University Science Books)an expamle calculation is made for the de
Broglie wavelength of a baseball traveling at 90 mph. Using the
relation lamda=h/p, the calculation gives the value
Pages: 1 2 July, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.