| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Question on observer's role in QM | 31 Aug 2004 12:53 GMT | 4 |
Quantum theory states that observation crates a relaity. i.e. Quantum object is represented by its wave function until some one looks at it.At that time, wave function representing an object collapses and quantum object [i.e. photon,electron etc) takes definite state.
|
| 511 kev line - why not 1022 kev? | 30 Aug 2004 16:10 GMT | 7 |
When an electron and a positron annihilate, one speaks of the 511 kev peak. But a mass equal to 1022 kev gets destroyed, so i am wondering why we see a peak at 511 kev?
|
| why general relativity is non-linear | 30 Aug 2004 11:05 GMT | 1 |
The gravitational force is caused by spin 2 force carriers. When these interact with vacuum particles and protons and electrons they become fermions with positive and negative electric charges. Gravity is a pushing force caused by the spin 2 carriers and
|
| de broglie and electron transitions caused by dark energy | 29 Aug 2004 18:06 GMT | 2 |
Is it possible that electron transitions from a high energy state to a low energy state are caused by the electrons interacting with some other partilces in the space around atoms.Let's look at the case of a hydrogen atom:
|
| Progress in Tapping Zero Point Energy for Space Exploration | 29 Aug 2004 13:08 GMT | 2 |
On Aug 27, 2004, at 3:53 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: PS I should make it clear that this latest paper by Hal Puthoff is a GOOD paper! It is very useful. Good references and it shows WHY Hal's approach here is wrong. It is wrong because it is incomplete not because
|
| CP Violation | 28 Aug 2004 16:44 GMT | 4 |
I'm doing a little research on CP Violation at the moment and was wondering if anyone has any simple explanations of the phenomena. Thanks, Aidan
|
| stupid question about the "delta minus" particle | 28 Aug 2004 15:28 GMT | 2 |
I know naught of which I speak, but I enjoy following the field. I don't know any of the math but I think I have a decent conceptual understanding, for a layman. A while back I was thinking about a baryon composed of three down
|
| Experimental Value for Hydrogen's Rydberg Constant | 28 Aug 2004 08:20 GMT | 1 |
Anyone know of a good, solid reference for hydrogen's experimental, observed value of its Rydberg constant or its ground state binding energy? Thanks for the info, Steve Bell
|
| Experimental Verification of Quarks | 27 Aug 2004 17:44 GMT | 12 |
After quarks have been discovered, are there any experiments also able to verify the fractional charge associated with each type of quarks? Or is that the fractional charge theoretically established? Does any one know how the three quarks made up a proton are arranged
|
| Gas in a vacuum | 26 Aug 2004 23:08 GMT | 3 |
If a bubble of lets say Helium was released into space, would it stay as a bubble or disperse into particles
|
| CERN ALICE Large Hadron Collider to accidentally destroy life on the planet? | 26 Aug 2004 17:03 GMT | 8 |
This message is posted by a concerned physicist, not at all a Luddite, and I think the human species and other life on Earth should get an answer before the curious cats among us produce a "mini Big Bang" anywhere in this part of the universe, like is being planned for 2007
|
| Electrical resistivity of Au question. | 26 Aug 2004 13:14 GMT | 1 |
Given that the electrical resistivity of Cu is 1.7 micro ohm cm and the bigger atom Ag is 1.6 micro ohm cm, why is still bigger atom Au 2.2 micro ohm cm? Is this a effect from the larger
|
| SMITHSONIAN Even Lies to Congressmen... | 25 Aug 2004 19:47 GMT | 1 |
> SMITHSONIAN'S LETTER TO U.S. CONGRESSMAN |
| LIGHT & MATTER-TWO MODES OF THE SAME THING. | 25 Aug 2004 07:37 GMT | 5 |
We have electrostatic fields -- and static magnetic fields. What if the two pair up in a symbiotic relationship -- like people, the farmer takes a wife. We could call this pair an electromagnetic field. My, my,
|
| de Broglie wave paradox? | 24 Aug 2004 17:57 GMT | 10 |
In chap 1, page 31, of "Quantum Chemistry" (McQuarrie, 1983, University Science Books)an expamle calculation is made for the de Broglie wavelength of a baseball traveling at 90 mph. Using the relation lamda=h/p, the calculation gives the value
|