| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Basics series proposed | 29 Nov 2004 16:39 GMT | 158 |
Since these are the three most active s.p. newsgroups, and also the forum for the highest concentration of misguided souls, I propose that we start a series of threads on fundamentals. It should be aimed at the "tripping points", the places where it's easy to get confused or
|
| The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity | 28 Nov 2004 16:19 GMT | 2 |
The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity Over the years the existence of a conflict between Quantum Theory and General Relativity has been repeatedly mentioned in publications. Quantum Theory deals very well with the very small. It has proven to be ...
|
| Is (are) there any particle(s) that`s emitted in all directions? | 26 Nov 2004 17:11 GMT | 14 |
Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever means) would be emitted in *all* directions preserving the topology of the grid?
|
| SOS! MY UKRAINE is in GRAVE DANGER NOW!!! | 23 Nov 2004 15:04 GMT | 2 |
Dear Friends and Colleagues! I have to wow for the help from all Democratic forces worldwide! Right now our criminal Government, is trying to announce V. Yanukovich, who served twice a sentence as a new President of Ukraine!!!
|
| Relativity and Reasonableness Tests | 23 Nov 2004 15:03 GMT | 2 |
Relativity and Reasonableness Tests Many postings to Newsgroups are from posters who have difficulty with the assertions of relativists that when tow velocities are added the resultant velocity is not the algebraic sum oof the two velocities. The conclusion is
|
| Charge Inverse Square Law may not be always valid. | 18 Nov 2004 21:53 GMT | 4 |
When one creates a positively charged body one also has to create a correspondingly negatively charged body. When measuring the force of attraction between the two bodies so created one finds that it varies as an inverse square law, so far so good.
|
| Attendance at the CERN in Geneva | 17 Nov 2004 18:32 GMT | 2 |
Hello dear community, I'm very interested to visit the CERN in Geneva, to learn more about the present science and to see the world's largest particle accelerator.
|
| PROOF of QUARKS' CONFINEMENT is FOR SALE! | 17 Nov 2004 12:37 GMT | 15 |
Dear Friends! I have obtained the final, bullet-proof derivation of Quarks' Confinement in QCD. This is potentially a Million Dollars $ venture, as proposed by Clay Institute!
|
| The Brilliance of Our Teachers | 13 Nov 2004 19:01 GMT | 9 |
The Brilliance of Our Teachers A recent newspaper question and answer column raised an interesting subject. The query noted that, for a science course at a local school, there were two instructors. One of those instructors explained the concepts clearly
|
| Potencial Energy-How stored? | 10 Nov 2004 11:58 GMT | 2 |
[img]http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/lasers/images/fig3.gif[/img] Hello, I have one question along with some justification:- How energy as "potential energy" is stored in sub-atomics, atomic,
|
| How to tell if a theory is a good one | 08 Nov 2004 07:30 GMT | 391 |
I'm writing this just to set a line in the sand for both alternate-theory posters and to those who respond to those posters. All too often, pyrotechnic rhetoric gets in the way of a very simple evaluation. 1. A good theory has to refer to well-defined terms and concepts. It does no
|
| What's up with the pentaquark? | 06 Nov 2004 18:03 GMT | 6 |
I attended a lecture here where a researcher gave a talk on the pentaquark. He said that in 1997, the pentaquark was theorized, and then they went around trying to get experimenters interested in looking to see for its possible existence. And, eventually, some
|
| Biot-Savart's Companion (11/3/04) | 05 Nov 2004 13:10 GMT | 1 |
\documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{graphicx} \topmargin=-3.5pc \oddsidemargin=-1pc \textheight=55pc
|
| dark energy is antimatter receiving energy from photons | 04 Nov 2004 22:03 GMT | 2 |
Cosmic microwave background photons redshift on their way to Earth. Their energy gets put into massless antimatter particles (the missing antimatter of the universe has been split into tiny pieces and their rest mass has been transferred to matter.The pieces do not annihilate
|
| quark rest mass equation | 01 Nov 2004 01:02 GMT | 17 |
for quarks of electric charge -1/3 rest mass = rest mass of down quark x n^2 where n = 1,3,5,7 for quarks of electric charge +2/3
|