Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Universe consisting of Photons27 Jan 2005 18:22 GMT1
Can anyone brief me on the new hypothesis that states that the universe
is made up of photons that dont move. Instead they behave like
particles of matter, in that a light source emits no photons only a
wave that passes through the constant photons.
Dual Space theory offers replacement for relativity's gravity26 Jan 2005 15:39 GMT19
This is a re-posting. My newsreader is at least 24 hours behind and am
having to use another computer.
I have rewritten parts of my book "Dual Space-New Physics for a New
Century"  to show how gravity works in Dual Space. The text is
The 'Eel'  or 'Snake' Model24 Jan 2005 15:03 GMT5
I would like to present methaphoricaly my idea of the
'Eel'  or 'Snake model' of particles
/\        /
/   \      /
Looking for answers.21 Jan 2005 21:45 GMT2
just have a question.  not sure if this is the proper forum to ask.  i
have no education in mathematics or physics.  i'm actually a struggling
art major.  though its probably obvious that i'm nither a math nor
physics major...just dont wanna get flamed for this if its an
Amateur physics research20 Jan 2005 21:29 GMT1
Hello, Friends
I have an idea to check out, where I should use
a good photomultiplier to register Cerenkov radiation.
As this would be kind of amateur research (low budget thing)
Structure of the Lepto-Quark20 Jan 2005 03:42 GMT2
http://stardrive.org
> On Jan 19, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:
>
>" Hi Paul,
Are all hadrons colourless?19 Jan 2005 23:04 GMT13
Since the proton is comprised of quarks with colour charge, and the
anti-proton is comprised of anti-quarks with anti-colour charge,
shouldn't the proton have a net colour of colourless and the
anti-proton have a net colour of anti-colourless (or black & white, to
Beware of cheap particles !!!19 Jan 2005 16:07 GMT2
Some cheap and pirated particles are made of plastic instead of real
atomic pieces, so these particles easily break and cause explosions !
So ALWAYS buy genuine particles !
Absolute space and motion18 Jan 2005 22:54 GMT1
If the space-time foam is considered a matrix of events, couldn't
you tell your motion relative to those events? Something like the
slower it "bubbles," the faster your absolute motion?
Also, since space is being created between clusters of galaxies,
Derivation of Schrodinger eqn solutions.12 Jan 2005 23:36 GMT1
I am reading An introduction to Quantum physics by French and Taylor which
is generally very clear.
However on page 207 there is (I believe) an important step missing in the
derivation of the the first three
DEATH RAY IONATRON ?  IOTN FRAUD ?12 Jan 2005 18:15 GMT1
There is a company called Ionatron that claims to have the ability to
produce very short bursts of laser light that will guide electron charges
( electricity )  that will disable electric devices , stun and even kill
living targets.  It's run by a notorious stock fraud promoter ...
Single photon double slit expe interpretation12 Jan 2005 08:20 GMT18
In the single photon double slit experiment where you shoot
single photon (one at a time) for a month. The screen would
still come out with an interference pattern. What's your
interpretation of it. Some say the photon splits and both
Unification of Physics?11 Jan 2005 14:17 GMT4
http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/unification_of_physics.pdf
http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/nature_of_the_physical_world_P2_FoS_V7N2.pdf
There are over 20 highly detailed free pdfs and scientific
papers at the above site that shows in great detail and illustration
Electron energy levels force field11 Jan 2005 09:47 GMT21
About a hundred years ago when the Rutherbord atom was
accepted. People couldn't figure out how the electron
move around the nucleus. They reasoned it couldn't
be orbiting because it would emit light, loose its
Enhanced Standard Model?10 Jan 2005 16:58 GMT2
http://www.commonsensescience.org/
Has anyone studied the above and read the scientific papers
written by numerous scientists and presented to conferences?
Their main arguments revolve around the hypotheses that that only
Pages: 1 2 December, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.