| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| The Einstein Hoax | 28 Feb 2005 20:27 GMT | 3 |
The Einstein Hoax "The Einstein Hoax" is intended for those who have been suspicious of the premise that reality is so subtle that it can only be understood in terms of sophisticated abstract mathematics to which only the elite was
|
| Is There a Force of Gravity? | 26 Feb 2005 00:07 GMT | 1 |
Is There a Force of Gravity? In undergraduate physics, the Newtonian concept of an attractive force between masses that is proportional to the product of the masses divided by the square of their separation is taught. When one advances to the more
|
| Imaginaning an Atomic Nucleus | 24 Feb 2005 10:46 GMT | 5 |
I find one of the most fundamental aspects of physics difficult to understand: charge. It drives me insane. Does anyone have an explanation to what a charge actually is? Are forces being emitted from the particle that interact with another
|
| Charge | 22 Feb 2005 17:18 GMT | 1 |
One of the most fundamental concepts in science drives me insane: charge. What exactly is a charge? Has anyone been able to visually describe a charge? Why do different fundamental particles have different charges?
|
| Proposed Quantum Mechanical Connection (2/21/05) | 22 Feb 2005 16:39 GMT | 2 |
\documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{graphicx} \topmargin=-3.5pc \oddsidemargin=-1pc \textheight=55pc
|
| Charge on electron and proton. | 21 Feb 2005 09:56 GMT | 2 |
This may be a relatively simple question (or not). But why is the charge on the electron and the proton exactly the same magnitude? 1.60e-19C?
|
| Is "Renormalization" normal?? | 20 Feb 2005 18:54 GMT | 7 |
Is anyone having problems believing renormalization is normal? I mean. Could it be "doctored" or sweeping under the carpet problems of a theory that was inherently flawed as he put it? La Violette said:
|
| Basics Series I: NEWTON, MAXWELL, EINSTEIN HOAXES - REVEALED! | 18 Feb 2005 15:33 GMT | 33 |
I am laying out the fundamentals of a new theory which replaces the so-called Standard Model, and which demonstrates that Newton, Maxwell, and Einstein were either fools or hucksters. ================================
|
| The Eel ' or 'Snake' Model for particles. | 14 Feb 2005 09:29 GMT | 8 |
I would like to prsent in somwhat a mathaphoric way my understanding and my findings about the Eel model or if you like the 'snake model' as far as the poor tool of asci is alowing me .....
|
| The Short Bearded Fellow | 05 Feb 2005 11:46 GMT | 1 |
... The guy's a little prick.
|
| Virtual particles | 04 Feb 2005 20:03 GMT | 5 |
Who knows how virtual particles meet to annihilate? After spawning from vacuum they might end up anywhere yet they always manage to annihilate (to conserve vacuum's zero-sum energy state). It seems that probability wave can collapse leaving particles anywhere,
|
| What is this "internal clock" in muon which slows down its rate of decay when they move very fast? | 04 Feb 2005 09:50 GMT | 83 |
Sorry if this is a stupid question - I'm a biologist with an amateur interest in physics. I was listening to an audio lecture by Richard Wolfson and he was talking about the experiment where, due to relativistic effects, the lifetime of muons is extended due to their rapid motion (0 ...
|
| Why lepto-quarks look like points | 03 Feb 2005 15:28 GMT | 3 |
On Jan 16, 2005, at 6:57 AM, Paul J. Werbos, Dr. wrote: At 10:37 PM 1/15/2005, Jack Sarfatti wrote: Strong short scale warping of space is essential to explain the deep inelastic electron scattering data. You miss the boat completely
|
| The TOTAL Disproof of Relativity and current QM | 01 Feb 2005 20:03 GMT | 2 |
> www.realityphysics.com < All comments and opinions are welcome. all the best, Jeff Lee CENTER FOR REALITY PHYSICS
|