| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Increasing the volume of a vacuum in space. | 30 Sep 2005 15:42 GMT | 4 |
Since the closest thing to a true vacuum we can find is in outer space, would it be possible to create a particle tight chamber in space that could be sealed and then somehow telescoped to increase the internal volume?
|
| A theory, by Ross A. Finlayson | 30 Sep 2005 02:33 GMT | 26 |
I'm here on sci.physics to say hello. How are you? I'm appropriately inequipped. My name name is Ross A. Finlayson. Yes, I do have a viewpoint on what is the fundamental nature of realirt,
|
| negative mass | 29 Sep 2005 19:53 GMT | 2 |
There is NEGATiVE mass ..in the GUESS Model.!! The GUESS *SiGNETiC* mass, mS = (n - 1)*m1 .!! Where n = Cavity of m1 DisCHARGE mass mD / m1. MORE mass MAY be DisCHARGED, from a CAViTY of
|
| Laser Acceleration of Leptons in Vacuum | 29 Sep 2005 15:24 GMT | 2 |
Here's an interesting article: http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/9/9/15/1 This is a laser accelerator that doesn't use the wakefield effect in a plasma. Instead you have separate laser and electron beams travelling
|
| The more abstract a theory is-the less chance to be wrong | 29 Sep 2005 10:52 GMT | 26 |
But at the same time .... *less useful*....... TIA Y.Porat
|
| Free particle model in QM | 27 Sep 2005 00:45 GMT | 2 |
In my text it states that a truncated TOP Hat function in one dimension f(x)= exp(iKx) | x | < or = d can be used as a simple model for a particle at time t=0 to explore the subsequent time development.
|
| Confusion on John Archibald Wheeler's "IT FROM BIT" | 23 Sep 2005 23:24 GMT | 11 |
Begin forwarded message: From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> Date: September 12, 2005 11:27:48 AM PDT To: Dan Smith <dantsmith@comcast.net>
|
| who is 'Auty' ??!! | 23 Sep 2005 07:08 GMT | 87 |
We meet lately a strange agressive nagging creature that calls itself Auty' there is no real name no clear country or institute identity!!
|
| Expectation value of time dependent solutions | 22 Sep 2005 22:27 GMT | 2 |
My quantum mechanics book states that for a free particle modelled by a top hat wave packet: <x> = Integral of (from -inf to +inf) | Psi(x,0) | ^2 x dx where Psi (x,0) represents the state of the particle at t=0
|
| SORRY Bilge ..about last POST.!! Bilge wrote:.. | 22 Sep 2005 20:58 GMT | 1 |
SORRY Bilge ..about last POST.!! Bilge wrote:..
> The the entire point of the experiment is discover whether > or not the `m' in Force = ma is the same `m' in Gm/r^2. -- You CONFUSE because "Gm/r^2" is NOT a FORCE, Bilge.!!
|
| m*a_2 = 4*(pi)^2*m*a_1 = G-force | 22 Sep 2005 18:13 GMT | 1 |
Bilge wrote:
> The the entire point of the experiment is discover whether > or not the `m' in Force = ma is the same `m' in Gm/r^2. -- You CONFUSE because your "Gm/r^2" is NOT a FORCE, Dimwit.!!
|
| Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations | 22 Sep 2005 12:01 GMT | 115 |
Is it possible to calculate the Nuclear Binding Energies of any element, any isotopes using some kind of formula? Is it accurate? What's the formula. David
|
| heavyside lorentz units | 21 Sep 2005 12:46 GMT | 1 |
Permeability Uo & Permittivity Eo cannot BOTH be UNiTY ..at once, in any COHERENT SYSTEM of STANDARD UNiTs.!! This is WHY the old HEAVYSiDE/LORENTZ (double) STANDARDs is ONLY used "in-house" now by ONLY the most dire GR-Tivity gtr GR Cracked-pots (crackedpots).
|
| Electron is not a point particle mathematically | 21 Sep 2005 12:20 GMT | 217 |
[reference line was too long for my server; had to start a new thread] "Bjoern Feuerbacher" <bjoern.feuerbacher@pci.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:db7qib$j6d$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
| FrediFizzx wrote: |
| the square root of 2 | 21 Sep 2005 08:40 GMT | 5 |
So I have a right triangle, sides 1 unit in length, that makes the hypotenuse sqrt(2) units long, right? So if the sides are 1mm long, how many decimal places can I calculate sqrt(2) to, to be PHYSICALLY meaningful?
|