Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Increasing the volume of a vacuum in space.30 Sep 2005 15:42 GMT4
Since the closest thing to a true vacuum we can find is in outer space,
would it be possible to create a particle tight chamber in space that
could be sealed and then somehow telescoped to increase the internal
volume?
A theory, by Ross A. Finlayson30 Sep 2005 02:33 GMT26
I'm here on sci.physics to say hello.
How are you?
I'm appropriately inequipped.  My name name is Ross A. Finlayson.  Yes,
I do have a viewpoint on what is the fundamental nature of realirt,
negative mass29 Sep 2005 19:53 GMT2
There is NEGATiVE mass ..in the GUESS Model.!!
The GUESS *SiGNETiC* mass, mS = (n - 1)*m1 .!!
Where n = Cavity of m1 DisCHARGE mass mD / m1.
MORE mass MAY be DisCHARGED, from a CAViTY of
Laser Acceleration of Leptons in Vacuum29 Sep 2005 15:24 GMT2
Here's an interesting article:
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/9/9/15/1
This is a laser accelerator that doesn't use the wakefield effect in a
plasma. Instead you have separate laser and electron beams travelling
The more abstract a theory is-the less chance to be wrong29 Sep 2005 10:52 GMT26
But at the same time ....
*less useful*.......
TIA
Y.Porat
Free particle model in QM27 Sep 2005 00:45 GMT2
In my text it states that a truncated TOP Hat function in one dimension
f(x)= exp(iKx)             | x | < or = d
can be used as a simple model for a particle at time t=0 to explore the
subsequent time development.
Confusion on John Archibald Wheeler's  "IT FROM BIT"23 Sep 2005 23:24 GMT11
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
Date: September 12, 2005 11:27:48 AM PDT
To: Dan Smith <dantsmith@comcast.net>
who is 'Auty'  ??!!23 Sep 2005 07:08 GMT87
We meet lately a strange agressive nagging creature
that calls itself
Auty'
there is no   real name no clear country or institute identity!!
Expectation value of time dependent solutions22 Sep 2005 22:27 GMT2
My quantum mechanics book states that for a free particle modelled by a top
hat wave packet:
<x> = Integral of (from -inf to +inf)   | Psi(x,0) | ^2 x  dx
where Psi (x,0) represents the state of the particle at t=0
SORRY Bilge ..about last POST.!! Bilge wrote:..22 Sep 2005 20:58 GMT1
SORRY Bilge ..about last POST.!! Bilge wrote:..
> The the entire point of the experiment is discover whether
> or not the `m' in Force = ma is the same `m' in Gm/r^2. --
You CONFUSE because "Gm/r^2" is NOT a FORCE, Bilge.!!
m*a_2 = 4*(pi)^2*m*a_1 = G-force22 Sep 2005 18:13 GMT1
Bilge wrote:
> The the entire point of the experiment is discover whether
> or not the `m' in Force = ma is the same `m' in Gm/r^2. --
You CONFUSE because your "Gm/r^2" is NOT a FORCE, Dimwit.!!
Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations22 Sep 2005 12:01 GMT115
Is it possible to calculate the Nuclear Binding Energies
of any element, any isotopes using some kind of formula?
Is it accurate? What's the formula.
David
heavyside lorentz units21 Sep 2005 12:46 GMT1
Permeability Uo & Permittivity Eo cannot BOTH be UNiTY ..at once,
in any COHERENT SYSTEM of STANDARD UNiTs.!! This is WHY the old
HEAVYSiDE/LORENTZ (double) STANDARDs is ONLY used "in-house" now
by ONLY the most dire GR-Tivity gtr GR Cracked-pots (crackedpots).
Electron is not a point particle mathematically21 Sep 2005 12:20 GMT217
[reference line was too long for my server; had to start a new thread]
"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <bjoern.feuerbacher@pci.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in
message news:db7qib$j6d$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
| FrediFizzx wrote:
the square root of 221 Sep 2005 08:40 GMT5
So I have a right triangle, sides 1 unit in length,
that makes the hypotenuse sqrt(2) units long, right?
So if the sides are 1mm long, how many decimal places can I calculate
sqrt(2) to, to be PHYSICALLY meaningful?
Pages: 1 2 3 August, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.