| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| are we so certain about uncertainty? | 20 Sep 2005 01:02 GMT | 39 |
heisenberg's uncertainty principle is a long-held tenet of quantum mechanics, and quantum field theory. Werner's description of the principle is described in his own words in his book:W. Heisenberg, The physical principles of the quantum theory, (Dover, New York, NY, 1949).
|
| Vector PROjECTiONs.!! | 19 Sep 2005 01:46 GMT | 8 |
$ Vector PROjECTiONs VECTORs are ONLY iMAGiNED ..and MEASURED ONLY in RETROSPECT.!! The VECTOR depends ARBiTRARiLY, and DiRECTLY, on POSiTiON B.!! The POSiTiON B therefore, CANNOT be CONjUGATE of POSiTiON A.!!
|
| COSmic reLiEF | 18 Sep 2005 23:02 GMT | 15 |
GUESS UNiVERSAL EQUATiON of STATE SYSTEM EQUATiON FRAME of REFERENCE for Planck MASS*Planck LENGTH: (Planck MASS Mp)*(Planck LENGTH lp) Mp*lp
|
| ambient matters | 18 Sep 2005 14:24 GMT | 4 |
$ ambient matters AMBiENT MEDiA are COMPOSED of MOLAR PARTiCLES (mol part).!! Boltzmann's constant k -> jOULE / (mol part) / degKelvin.!! The (mol part) here is a MOLAR PARTiCLE of AMBiENT MEDiA.!!
|
| HUP down | 17 Sep 2005 12:34 GMT | 3 |
$ Planck UNcertainty Planck HiMSELF did ORiGiNAL DERiVATiON h EQUATiON = (+or-) h. Note this was reduced for the photon & phonon to (+or-) hbar. PLANCK EQUATiON claims KNOWLEDGE is MATHEMATiCALLY QUANTiZED.
|
| "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?" | 16 Sep 2005 20:54 GMT | 1 |
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?" "The Einstein Hoax", and its related texts, were written because post-Einstein physics has been degraded from a science which relies on
|
| PLANCK TEMPERATURE Tp | 16 Sep 2005 14:06 GMT | 13 |
'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'` ____ _ _ _ _ | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | | | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / |_| |_|
|
| Photoelectric effect is not quantized | 15 Sep 2005 17:32 GMT | 3 |
10 Photoelectric effect has a simple Ed 01.12.31 --------------------------------- classical justification -----------------------
|
| Forces and residual forces. | 15 Sep 2005 16:15 GMT | 7 |
The strong force supposed to be attractive and repulsive. Has a repulsive strong force ever been detected experimentally. Is there any experimental evidence for a repulsive residual strong force?
|
| Canonical Quantization & QFT book recommendations | 15 Sep 2005 06:36 GMT | 17 |
What is the best QFT book you have read? I can't find the info about canonical quantization in Feynman Lectures in Physics vol 1-3 nor in Penrose Road to Reality and Griffith's Introduction to Elementary Particles.
|
| ABSORBED photon NO boson | 14 Sep 2005 01:30 GMT | 2 |
Re: Why Quantum Theory excludes Gravity
| Jim Carr <j...@dirac.scri.fsu.edu> wrote | in article <8e70rv$f6...@news.fsu.edu>... |
| LORENTZ bull | 13 Sep 2005 13:18 GMT | 1 |
$ LORENTZ bull Newton's LAWs of MECHANiCS apply, ONLY CENTRO-symmetrically.!! Maxwell's LAWs of ELECTRODYNAMiCs, ONLY BETWEEN FLAT PLATEs.!! RELATiViTY applies in SPACEtime at ONLY ONE WORLDline POiNT.!!
|
| Observing is WORK | 13 Sep 2005 13:16 GMT | 1 |
$ Observing is WORK FOUNDATiON Observing is HARD WORK for gedanken LiTTLE iMPs.!! But, they're ON CALL.!! 24/7.!! To LOOK for you.!! Max BORN is of NO assistance.!! So, PLEASE CALL.!!
|
| statistical and thermal flux | 12 Sep 2005 20:11 GMT | 1 |
'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*' ____ _ _ _ _ | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | | | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / |_| |_|
|
| BEC Powerful Tool for Quantum Vacuum Measurement | 12 Sep 2005 06:13 GMT | 5 |
I liked this article: http://focus.aps.org/story/v16/st8 It compares the Bose-Einstein Condensate to the Laser, in terms of being a powerful tool with which to measure the Quantum Vacuum. Even Dr
|