Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / January 2006

wavelength = h/p
where h= planck's constant
p = momentum

U(1) gauge symmetry describes electromagnetism and Abelian. But
a theorist suggests that halfway from the Big Bang to this locality
we have now, EM has a higher SU(2) gauge symmetry in which
magnetic monopoles in the vacuum exist that can give rise to electric

Friends,
If you are
either interested in seeing the logical invalidation of SR,
or just curious to know how SR could be invalidated logically,

MEaT: Matter, Energy and Time
Consider the following equation:
[1] E =
Most people will recognize it as describing the energy of a photon. However, consider this equation in a different form:

Not sure if it's true but...
"An electromagnetic wave provided with enough energy will reach an energy
saturation level. It will loose it's sinusoidal wave like resonance and
cause the aether to break into particulate matter."

A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
    The results of quantum theory were described as "spooky" by
Drs. Einstein, Podalsky, and Rosen because quantum theory seemed to reject
"objective reality". They believed that all observed effects must be

The electron and positron are acording to the paradigma
'point particles'
that means 'final particles'
if they are 'final'  then nothing can  anihilate them

I have two questions for any physicists out there.
First of all, can entanglement apply to WAVES as well as particles? I
was wondering if a quantum computer can be built using only waves, not
particles and all kinds of extremely unlikely StarGates and other tools

Special relativity tells us the following:
Nothing can be accelerated to the speed of light in a vacuum.
I would like to suggest that the following statement should be taken
into account, if it isn't already.

PART A:            New I T PERCEPT-tron.       [BiGGER.wpd];
Time 03:14iPMsun01jan2006..     ..edited Ni, added more GPS.
[nL*(h + nA*hbar)/sec=nL*Ni*h/sec=nL*Ni*Qx*J/10^25*("e")^4].
GUESS general Planck Stefan Boltzmann Stuckless PHOTOenergy:

"A Snapshot of a Photon"
    The photon has been viewed as a somewhat mysterious entity
which sometimes has the properties of a particle and sometimes has the
properties oaf a wave. It would seem interesting to see, therefore, whether

Regarding the mass of electrons, I have a rather deep question. As I
understand it, electrons that are more massive (muons) bind closer to
the proton because the bohr radius depends on mass. Now if a collision
were ULTRA-ULTRA energetic, is it possible the resulting ultra-heavy

On Jan 3, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Gary S. Bekkum wrote:
FYI
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4524132.stm
"Cern's chief theorist Professor John Ellis even thinks finding the

The Lorentz factor:
1/(1-v^2/C^2)
does not apply to the photon!
that will make physics much more and far more simpler

I am trying to confirm the perturbation loop interpretation of the
generations.
Please take a look.
http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm