Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / March 2006

1) Consider the unit cube. There is a point like particle bouncing
around inside the box like a billiard ball, but it does not neccesarily
obey the laws of reflection when it bounces off walls. It's motion is
highly unpredictable and it looks like it is random. The system, on

Has anyone heard (or have studied the work) of Dr. Paulo Correa?
What is your thought of him and his work?
see http://www.aetherometry.com
He has a sophisticated aether model with experimental support

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\topmargin=-3.5pc
\oddsidemargin=-1pc

$$                   POiNT-mass axial-symmetry.
$$      Tom Roberts has covered POiNT-mass axial-symmetry.
$$  Once you ATTACH the TOP & BOTTOM rockets (or LEFT & RiGHT),
$$ you SiMPLY apply DiFFERENT thrusts by the TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs

According to Dr. Correa, "ambipolar charges continuously alternate
between polar states, or, to say it more accurately, constantly vary
their polarity during forward propagation"
Does anyone know a way to test this? If such a particle can be

$$  The PERiODiC iSOTOPiC TABLE ..of Elementary NUCLEAR mass:
$$ Fine structure ALPHA a = (n - 1) = 0.007292667189 = 2*pi*ae
                  = (mD / m1) - 1
                   = (mp / u) - 1

$$ Gregory L. Hansen wrote: > > > NILS BÖRJESSON > >A question:

"The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
    It is recognized that Special Relativity provides the Lorentz
Transformations for Length and Time and Mass between reference frames having
a relative velocity. What is too often not recognized that, in so doing, it

By evacuating all of space and granting just two particles the context
of dimensionality takes on a striking choice.
If we allow for just one distance between these two particles then we
might claim a one-dimensional system as in classical physics where we

I don't understand: On the one hand with special relativity Einstein
got rid of the aether - the medium which electromagnetic waves use to
travel and which can be used as an absolute reference system. On the
other hand in quantum field theory quantum fields are invented which

For days I was grappling with the mystery behind entanglement and
searched the literature. Do you know where John Bell got the
inspiration to pursue the entanglement thing and the subsequent
experimental proof by Aspect. It's from David Bohm. Bohm believes the

A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
    The results of quantum theory were described as "spooky" by Drs.
Einstein, Podalsky, and Rosen because quantum theory seemed to reject
"objective reality". They believed that all observed effects must be

Quantum electrodynamics says there is endless loop of virtual particles
being created surrounding the electron and for calculations to be
right,
the charge of the electron has to be infinite.

I´m 14 yeas old and i´m living in Austria. and I´m would refer about
Atombombs (Technologie, History, what ever)
so if you like please write about it or you can sent a .ppt
If is possible Please write in German

Space is real and not illusion, isn't it. So how can you explain
entanglement. One can state there there is a signal being exchanged.
But the so called Kochen Specker theorem says that non-locality is
not true because there are no properties before measurement so