Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
"How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"29 Oct 2006 00:53 GMT1
"How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
    One of the basic beliefs of modern physics is that the velocity of
light is the same wherever and whenever it is measured. It is, in the
language of physics, invariant. To illustrate this understanding, let us
nuclear explosion detection21 Oct 2006 11:01 GMT1
multiple sources seems to confirm that the recent claim of north korean
nuclear explosion is suspect because the strentgh of the explosion,
which is apparently well estimated , is low
are there other ways to be sure ? with particle detection around the
Electron Bounce Model20 Oct 2006 21:12 GMT14
I continue to have problems understanding the current picture of the
Atom and its interactions with the electron, as explained by Modern
Physics. I prefer this model:
My thoughts are that an electron is continually trying to unite with
Quark scale, Electron Clouds.11 Oct 2006 09:59 GMT1
If I could be scaled down to the local area containing Quarks, looking
up, would I have to conclude that, because of the Electrons orbit/cloud
overhead, that I and the Quarks actually exist WITHIN an Electron?
Would I observe any gaps where the Electron did not exist?
"Aspin Bubbles" has been published.10 Oct 2006 21:05 GMT3
"Aspin Bubbles": a Non-linear Mechanical Interaction for the
Unification of the Forces of Nature has been published.
"Aspin Bubbles" is published in the Online Journal: APEIRON, studies in
infinite nature.
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"10 Oct 2006 04:41 GMT2
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
    It is the currently accepted "truth" that there is no experimental
evidence of the Aether. This seems surprising because, if the Aether made
its presence any more obvious, physicists would have teeth marks on their
"The Nature of Mass"09 Oct 2006 16:44 GMT1
"The Nature of Mass"
    We have all been taught in our physics classes that mass is one of the
fundamental entities of our reality and that all of the effects occurring in
our Universe are dependent on interactions between masses. It behooves us
Two protons07 Oct 2006 07:54 GMT6
If I tell you that two protons do not repel each other, would you think
that I am a lunatic? I told this in sci.physics.relativity, and the first
answers were that there should be millions of proofs against it. I
answered that I need only one. After a few days it became evident that ...
SU(3) Theory of Quantized Charge and Hypercharge (STQCH)06 Oct 2006 18:52 GMT5
I would like to call attention to an exact SU(3) theory of 8 angles in
differential representation, that have been developing since the
1960's. I have recently done some more work on this theory and have
created a website describing the theory and providing references to
Electron Orbits / Probability bands04 Oct 2006 18:35 GMT4
In attempting to determine the electron's behavior around an ATOM , has
it ever been supposed that the the Electron is constantly attempting to
merge with its associated Proton, but that it impacts the surrounding
neutrons which resonate energy back to the electron? It would explain ...
rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You  have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc204 Oct 2006 13:21 GMT1
rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You  have made comments that Momentum is not
Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years
of E=mc2
rpasken@eas.slu.edu
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research )  in various post .  But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book04 Oct 2006 07:27 GMT1
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as
Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear
Research )  in various post .  But it proved all fraud. He was disusing
about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"01 Oct 2006 10:47 GMT1
"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
    The present philosophy in theoretical physics is to search for
mathematical relationships that predict experimental results that are then
used to verify the validity of the mathematics in defining our physical
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.