Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / July 2007

Einstein wanted "the unified field theory".
I believe that there is a real unified theory.
But the meaning of "unified" in Einstein is the "classified" for me.
For Einstein, the dimension is only 4 ( space and time).

What would the consequence for atoms be if all photons in existence
dissapeared?
Can Atoms exist without Photons?

Sir Isaac Newton, has originated, inter-conversion of mass and energy,
(E=mc2 )
Newton has stated first of all about inter conversion of mass and
energy. Einstein has derived first mathematical equation for the same.

Change
 Here the 10^-27 cm monopole cores separated by 10^-17 cm lattice spacing.
to
 Here the 10^-27 cm monopole cores separated by 10^-27 cm lattice spacing.

I believe that the future is determined entirely.
At the same time I believe that I can not know the future.
And I believe that there are local hidden variables.
For me, Einstein is the God.

by what mechanism in general relativity does matter interact with the
dimensions of spacetime? this is Newtonian and cause and effect would
have to apply
in quantum mechanics, which alone is not compatible with general

"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
    Cosmological observations have recently indicated that the "expansion"
of the universe to be faster at extreme distances than it is over most of
its observable volume. There have been attempts to reconcile ...

does the Transactional Interpretation (with advanced and retarded waves)
hold up even considering Bell's Theorem?

"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
    Modern physics seems to be searching for ways to incorporate all
physical phenomena into a single unified theory. The question that comes to
mind is why? The question arises as to the conceptual need for such an