| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| "Is More Than One Quark Needed?" | 29 Jan 2008 07:12 GMT | 1 |
"Is More Than One Quark Needed?" Present literature tells us that both neutrons and protons contain three observable internal particles named "quarks". Observationally, quarks cannot exist for more than an instant of time outside of a proton or neutron
|
| Analytical discussion on Newton's G and the Electron, | 28 Jan 2008 16:13 GMT | 1 |
It has long been accepted that Newton's gravitational relation is valid and gives the force between two masses located IN OBSERVER SPACE, i.e. F = G(m/d)^2. Note that G originates only with this relation.
|
| "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity" | 27 Jan 2008 06:22 GMT | 1 |
"Dimensional Analysis and Relativity" Over the years the writer has received E-mails which strongly assert that the techniques of Dimensional Analysis ARE OF NO BENEFIT in the study of relativistic phenomena without any justification for that strong
|
| Why is mass^2 "proportional" to total angular momentum in mesons (Regge theory)? | 21 Jan 2008 15:06 GMT | 3 |
Regge theory states that mass m and angular momentum J are related by m^2 ~ c+d*J for mesons of similar properties. It s also states that this
|
| Question about Photons - | 03 Jan 2008 09:04 GMT | 1 |
Can a single photo be in more than one frequency state at one time? I realise photons will change in frequency, but can a photon 'carry' more than one frequency state simultaneously?
|
| Is quantum uncertainty true reality or an artifact of our sensory means? | 01 Jan 2008 05:44 GMT | 1 |
I hope I frame the question/proposition in a suitable manner to warrant thoughtful feedback by thoughtful groupies. I warn you upfront that I am, quite unfortunately, not capable of setting forth mathematical or theoretical arguments/substantiations so
|