Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / September 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
The first field theory-continua29 Sep 2004 14:30 GMT2
The theoretical basis of the mechanics of continua is the
first field theory, and is often neglected. We can learn a lot
about fields from this theory.
The Lagrangian for cold matter is the 4-form
complex conjugate of wavefunction29 Sep 2004 14:28 GMT3
The general wavefunction for a free particle is:
Y (x,t) = A cos( kx - wt) + iA sin (kx - wt)
and the complex conjugate is:
Y*(x,t) = A cos( kx - wt) - iA sin (kx - wt)
Waves in MHD and plasmas--relativistic theory29 Sep 2004 14:28 GMT2
As a student I was taught about MHD and plasmas as nonrelativistic
theories. I have always thought that this is a mistake from the start.
How can one have a non-relativistic theory of the EM field?
Is not EM fundamentally relativistic, especially if one is going
quantization of electric charge29 Sep 2004 08:25 GMT15
Why would the existence of magnetic monopoles mean that electric
charge is quantized as Paul Dirac thought?
arXiv endorsement request29 Sep 2004 08:25 GMT17
I'm looking for an endorsement so that I can submit an article to
the physics.ed-ph section of arXiv. According to the rules, the
endorsement must come from someone who's registered as an endorser
for the physics.ed-ph (Physics Education) subject class of arXiv.
Quantum Computer Algorithms28 Sep 2004 17:50 GMT4
Google is your friend:
http://www.fact-index.com/q/qu/quantum_computer.html
has answers to most of your detailled questions.
However, I'll take a stab at answering your first question, because I'm
QED and the speed of light28 Sep 2004 16:20 GMT12
Based on what I've read by Feynman on QED he says there are ways of
the photon travelling faster or slower than the speed of light:
<quote>
It may surprise you that there is an amplitude for a photon to go at
Magnetic Monopole28 Sep 2004 16:20 GMT5
How much disruption or inconvenience would mainline physics theories
suffer if a magnetic monopole were found. GTR would not be impacted.
What of the quantum type theories?
Bob Kolker
why is euclidean geometry so important?28 Sep 2004 16:20 GMT4
According to Klein's erlanger program, Euclidean geometry(in two
dimensions) is a study of invariants of the groups of rigid motions of the
plane. Hence , isnt it true that if we begin with just the vector space
R^2 and the group of rigid motions(taken as an abstract group), we ...
inonu-wigner contraction28 Sep 2004 16:19 GMT4
Dear physicists, as you know, recently Prof. Erdal Inonu from Sabanci
University in Istanbul, Turkey, won the Wigner medal for his
contribution to Inonu-Wigner contraction. The media mentioned the
event but no one really explained what this inonu-wigner contraction
"Emergence of a 4D World from Causal Quantum Gravity"28 Sep 2004 08:27 GMT4
What do you gravity experts think of:
Emergence of a 4D World from Causal Quantum Gravity
J. Ambj=F8rn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll
Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 131301 (2004)
Properties of Dark Matter28 Sep 2004 08:26 GMT4
   I've been wondering if anyone has looked at the observational
constraints on the properties of Dark Matter.
   For example, if Dark Matter had its own equivalent of
electromagnetic or nuclear forces, it might be able to form atoms
Laplace vs. Fourier27 Sep 2004 09:32 GMT15
Being a physicist, I am comfortable with using Fourier transforms
to swap from time to frequency spaces.  This involves (to within a
constant or so..)taking the integral from negative infinity to
positive infinity.
Quantization....27 Sep 2004 09:32 GMT27
Skimming over the latest entry in the String Coffee Table (not
understanding any of it) I was plunged into some of the discussions on
the relaxed quantization conditions with some people arguing that that
alone was basis enough not to take QLG serious. This triggered some
Basic QM Question27 Sep 2004 09:31 GMT2
Let's say we write down the Schroedinger equation for hydrogen. We
then solve it and get among other things the pdf for the electron's
orbit.
My question is: why didn't I use the pdf of the electron as a form
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 August, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.