Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / March 2005

Moshe Carmeli claims to have shown that Schwarzschild + expansion will
lead to a MOND type acceleration.
eg
astro-ph/9907244

When people write about "backward volume spin waves" like at:
http://www.eltech.ru/kafedrs/fet_eips/persoh1/KOSTYLEV/4.pdf
or
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=TEPHEX00004
7000011001350000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes

I browsed through David Gross' Nobel lecture slides (URL below) and
noticed the following quote of Landau (1960):
"We reach the conclusion that within the limits of formal
electrodynamics a point interaction is equivalent, for any intensity

In Bjorken and Drell - QED part 1 I read a statement that one doesnt
use a square rooted  Hamiltonian (H= SQRT/m*2.c*4+m*2.p*2/) in a wave
equation of the Schoedinger type
(–ih.dpsi/dt=H.psi) because after expanding the root in Taylor series

That's say I have a space with two electrons moving in different
directions.
____o>
_________________<o

Given that spontaneous particle-antiparticle pair production
can occur at any given point and time is there any
possibility that more than one event like this could occur at
the same point and time.

Also available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week212.html
March 26, 2005
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics - Week 212
John Baez    

So, we know the weak, strong, electromagnetic, and gravitational
interactions. But we also know (or at least, I believe) that there is a
fifth, (and possibly sixth, seventh, eigth, and so on, to be discovered in
thousands to millions of years.) Could the fifth one be what gives ...

According to standard lore, the quantization of a diffeomorphism-
invariant theory like general relativity can not have local degrees
of freedom. Hence the best description of quantum gravity we can
hope for is in terms of holographic data living on the boundary of

This may seem like a stupid question but if black holes radiate, and
smaller black holes radiate faster,  could a small black hole be used
to convert mass into energy with 100% efficiency?  What would be the
drawbacks to this (besides the obvious of course)?

It is often claimed that the cosmological constant is off by 120
orders of magnitude (or 30 orders on a linear scale). The argument
is basically that vacuum has an energy due to zero-point fluctuations,
whose reality is proven by the Casimir effect. Now Jaffe claims in

On howstuffworks.com... article on photon teleportation...
http://travel.howstuffworks.com/teleportation2.htm
The article only goes into a basic description of how entanglement
works, and I wasn't able to find a more detailed one anywhere else. I

DEAR PHYSICS
MY NAME IS BILLY.I HAVE DOWN SYNDROME.I LIKE PHYSICS.PHYSICS TELLS ME
THINGS.I LIKE THINGS LIKE TIME.I WANT TO LEARN LOTS OF THINGS.I AM NOT
AFRAID.AM I SMART ENOUGH?

Is it possible to do work without
an increase in entropy?
What is the proof?
I am not a student.