Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / July 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Quick question about DeBroglie wavelength and UCM31 Jul 2005 20:50 GMT1
Is it correct to state that a mass in uniform circular motion has a constant
DeBroglie wavelength because its angular momentum is constant? It seems to me
that otherwise lambda would eventually vanish to zero? On the other hand, how
could the change in the linear momentum of such a ...
pion and supersymmetry31 Jul 2005 08:14 GMT1
Is there some way of putting a pseudoscalar particle (the pion, say)
and a fermion (the muon, say) in the same supersymmetric multiplet?
An other thing... sometimes superspace grassmanian coordinates are
described as "infinitesimal". Does it mean that we can get superspace
General Hamilton-Poisson Mechanics30 Jul 2005 08:46 GMT4
Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics are examples of
the general Hamilton-Poisson mechanics
q' = {q,H}, (q' is the time derivative of q)
p' = {p,H},
Light reading for high brows30 Jul 2005 08:45 GMT1
I'd like to recommend a bit of summer reading from the good people at
the Princeton U Press, entitled 'Mathematics in Nature.'
Written by John A. Adams, Professor of Mathematics at Old Dominion U,
this handsome book offers a wealth of insight on topics drawn from all
do photons distort spacetime?29 Jul 2005 08:42 GMT6
i didn't see this in the sci.physics FAQ (which is awesome, btw), so
i'll just go ahead and ask: do photons, being energy, distort
spacetime, and thus interact gravitationally with massive particles and
each other?
Nested commutators as derivatives? Is a Lie group closed? And relations to parallel transport?28 Jul 2005 09:04 GMT1
This is a mainly mathematical question, but I posted some
physics-related questions right at the end.
I am trying to understand how the product of 2 or more exponentials of
linear combinations of generators of a lie group would yield a single
Atomic General Relativity28 Jul 2005 09:03 GMT12
Atomic GR...?
Let's assume we're approaching a  "generic" neutral
isolated atom in a midget nano-craft. We intend to
measure Einstein's Law G_uv=T_uv as we tend into
Pseudorandom number generators in nature?27 Jul 2005 22:32 GMT12
Howdy,
I've been wondering lately if pseudo-random number generators of
computer science could occur naturally? I was thinking some processes
like flows of liquids with some velocity passed two cross-sections: say
Maxwell's Demon27 Jul 2005 10:11 GMT8
Has the advent of Quantum Statistical Mechanics led to an
uncontroversial resolution of the paradox of Maxwell's Demon? If so,
what is the currently accepted solution?
Vonny N.
Time, Parameter, Operator26 Jul 2005 08:00 GMT27
Dear Members,
on p.68 of Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" we read "... Time
is just a parameter in quantum mechanics, not an operator. In
particular, Time is not an observable in the language of the previous
String Theory Vs Quantum Gravity : Politics26 Jul 2005 06:15 GMT1
Author: Suresh K Maran (universalwatch.blogspot.com)
In one of my posting regarding critique of Lubos Motl of Loop quantum
gravity, I mentioned that the protectionist measures of string
theorists are preventing non-perturbative quantum gravity (loop quantum
Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?24 Jul 2005 07:13 GMT8
Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics
texts?  I checked a dozen and found no reference, even in the very
thorough Messiah text.  I can find very little on the web.  One would
think that it would be first thing covered after the free particle.
Hawkings new paper23 Jul 2005 16:24 GMT2
Published at last -the paper on  information loss.Can any of the experts
say if it holds up
[ Mod. note: The paper can be found at
   http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0507171
QUIVER GAUGE THEORIES23 Jul 2005 16:23 GMT2
I'm trying to read "Brane Dimers and Quiver Gauge Theories"
hep-th/0504110. Can someone define the term quiver gauge theory for me
or refer me to an earlier hep-th paper where the term is defined?
Thanks! georgie
Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?23 Jul 2005 15:25 GMT160
Is state-vector reduction (or collapse of the wavefunction) a physical
process? Or is it really an artefact of our procedure of canonical
quantisation?
In the Feynman path integral approach to Quantum Theory, state-vector
Pages: 1 2 3 June, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.