| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Quick question about DeBroglie wavelength and UCM | 31 Jul 2005 20:50 GMT | 1 |
Is it correct to state that a mass in uniform circular motion has a constant DeBroglie wavelength because its angular momentum is constant? It seems to me that otherwise lambda would eventually vanish to zero? On the other hand, how could the change in the linear momentum of such a ...
|
| pion and supersymmetry | 31 Jul 2005 08:14 GMT | 1 |
Is there some way of putting a pseudoscalar particle (the pion, say) and a fermion (the muon, say) in the same supersymmetric multiplet? An other thing... sometimes superspace grassmanian coordinates are described as "infinitesimal". Does it mean that we can get superspace
|
| General Hamilton-Poisson Mechanics | 30 Jul 2005 08:46 GMT | 4 |
Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics are examples of the general Hamilton-Poisson mechanics q' = {q,H}, (q' is the time derivative of q) p' = {p,H},
|
| Light reading for high brows | 30 Jul 2005 08:45 GMT | 1 |
I'd like to recommend a bit of summer reading from the good people at the Princeton U Press, entitled 'Mathematics in Nature.' Written by John A. Adams, Professor of Mathematics at Old Dominion U, this handsome book offers a wealth of insight on topics drawn from all
|
| do photons distort spacetime? | 29 Jul 2005 08:42 GMT | 6 |
i didn't see this in the sci.physics FAQ (which is awesome, btw), so i'll just go ahead and ask: do photons, being energy, distort spacetime, and thus interact gravitationally with massive particles and each other?
|
| Nested commutators as derivatives? Is a Lie group closed? And relations to parallel transport? | 28 Jul 2005 09:04 GMT | 1 |
This is a mainly mathematical question, but I posted some physics-related questions right at the end. I am trying to understand how the product of 2 or more exponentials of linear combinations of generators of a lie group would yield a single
|
| Atomic General Relativity | 28 Jul 2005 09:03 GMT | 12 |
Atomic GR...? Let's assume we're approaching a "generic" neutral isolated atom in a midget nano-craft. We intend to measure Einstein's Law G_uv=T_uv as we tend into
|
| Pseudorandom number generators in nature? | 27 Jul 2005 22:32 GMT | 12 |
Howdy, I've been wondering lately if pseudo-random number generators of computer science could occur naturally? I was thinking some processes like flows of liquids with some velocity passed two cross-sections: say
|
| Maxwell's Demon | 27 Jul 2005 10:11 GMT | 8 |
Has the advent of Quantum Statistical Mechanics led to an uncontroversial resolution of the paradox of Maxwell's Demon? If so, what is the currently accepted solution? Vonny N.
|
| Time, Parameter, Operator | 26 Jul 2005 08:00 GMT | 27 |
Dear Members, on p.68 of Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" we read "... Time is just a parameter in quantum mechanics, not an operator. In particular, Time is not an observable in the language of the previous
|
| String Theory Vs Quantum Gravity : Politics | 26 Jul 2005 06:15 GMT | 1 |
Author: Suresh K Maran (universalwatch.blogspot.com) In one of my posting regarding critique of Lubos Motl of Loop quantum gravity, I mentioned that the protectionist measures of string theorists are preventing non-perturbative quantum gravity (loop quantum
|
| Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics? | 24 Jul 2005 07:13 GMT | 8 |
Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics texts? I checked a dozen and found no reference, even in the very thorough Messiah text. I can find very little on the web. One would think that it would be first thing covered after the free particle.
|
| Hawkings new paper | 23 Jul 2005 16:24 GMT | 2 |
Published at last -the paper on information loss.Can any of the experts say if it holds up [ Mod. note: The paper can be found at http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0507171
|
| QUIVER GAUGE THEORIES | 23 Jul 2005 16:23 GMT | 2 |
I'm trying to read "Brane Dimers and Quiver Gauge Theories" hep-th/0504110. Can someone define the term quiver gauge theory for me or refer me to an earlier hep-th paper where the term is defined? Thanks! georgie
|
| Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'? | 23 Jul 2005 15:25 GMT | 160 |
Is state-vector reduction (or collapse of the wavefunction) a physical process? Or is it really an artefact of our procedure of canonical quantisation? In the Feynman path integral approach to Quantum Theory, state-vector
|