| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| The neutrino | 30 Jan 2006 22:15 GMT | 2 |
I read today (http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/hienergy/stdmodel.html) that: "It is currently thought, on the basis of Super Kamiokande result, that neutrinos have mass. Yet, we do not know whether this would mean that, as Majorana suggested, the neutrino is its own
|
| what physical mechanism causes space to expand? | 28 Jan 2006 20:41 GMT | 5 |
I frequently read how inflation caused the size of the universe to expand many times over and I was wondering what is the physical mechanism that causes actual space to expand. Thanks,
|
| orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement; | 28 Jan 2006 20:41 GMT | 12 |
I have heard it said that there is exist shapes in the world, shapes such as the shapes and symmetries of flowers, crystals (and cabbages and kings) exactly because atoms aren't all spherically symmetric. Most atoms (taking higher orbitals of hydrogenic atoms as a guide) have ...
|
| nonlocal effective action by integrating out fermions | 25 Jan 2006 01:25 GMT | 4 |
Starting with the pathintegral of a gauge theory, say Qed to keep it simple, and (Grassmann-)integrating out a quadratic fermion action you end up with a determinant of the Dirac Operator essentialy. It is always said that we get a nonlocal contribution to the action that way.
|
| Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field | 24 Jan 2006 18:54 GMT | 8 |
A photon emitted by an atom(clock) at a lower potential in a static gravitational field undergoes a redshift when it is absorbed and emitted by another atom at a higher potential. My question is: why does not or should not a photon undergo a redshift in a static
|
| Entropy vs. Variance | 23 Jan 2006 22:08 GMT | 4 |
I am really new one. My question is what is difference between Entropy and Variance of R.V. Are Entropy and Variance equal in providing information in physics? I try to understand them. Thanks for any comments.
|
| Thermal fluctuations of space-time | 23 Jan 2006 19:56 GMT | 2 |
I recently tried to understand general relativity. Basically, I have seen how can one construct from the action principle the equations of motion of particles or classical fields and the equations of motion of the curvature of the space-time (Einstein equations). I was wondering
|
| Dirac's negative energy sea | 22 Jan 2006 22:02 GMT | 3 |
In every situation I'm aware of, energy states exist because of some force that gives rise to them (dE/dx, y'know). What force did Dirac envision as giving rise to his proposed negative energy states (from which antimatter arises)? When I see it described in textbooks, the
|
| rotation of electron | 22 Jan 2006 21:59 GMT | 2 |
When Feynman was at Cornell while eating lunch in the cafeteria he observed a student throwing a plate and noticed that the blue school logo spun around faster than the wobble of the plate. For the fun of it he worked out the equation of motion which showed that if the wobble is
|
| conjugacy classes in Lorentz/deSitter groups | 21 Jan 2006 08:01 GMT | 1 |
Does someone know the conjugacy classes in the groups SO(4,1) and SO(3,2)? I might be even happier if someone had worked out a classification of conjugacy classes for every real simple Lie group, but I need to know these cases
|
| Falling in water | 20 Jan 2006 00:53 GMT | 3 |
Can somebody suggest me good references on physics of a body falling in a viscous fluid like water? What is the equation of motion F = mx"(t) in water and how can it be solved for x(t)? -pj
|
| A query regarding fractals!!! | 17 Jan 2006 17:41 GMT | 2 |
Dear friends, I am doing PHD on the subject of turbulence......I have just started....Could anyone have any idea that is there a system which has such a parameter which if varied continously changes the "box dimension" of the system continously?? I am glad to have joined this
|
| Is everything entangled | 16 Jan 2006 22:16 GMT | 2 |
I was wondering whether it were possible that every particle in the universe is entangled with every other. The argument goes: at the moment of the Big Bang, this was the case(dubious). Once everything is entangled, it remains so for the rest of eternity.
|
| What is quantum measurement problem? | 15 Jan 2006 04:29 GMT | 16 |
What is quantum measurement problem? Why do people say decoherence does not solve the quantum measurement problem? Thank your for any of your comment.
|
| one or many particles? | 15 Jan 2006 04:29 GMT | 10 |
OK, I am reviewing my basic quantum mechanics by watching Jim Branson's QM class on streaming video. There is something he keeps say that bothers me. He keeps saying that a wave function like exp(ikx) can't be normalized to "one particle" and so must be a beam of particles?
|