Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / February 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)28 Feb 2006 18:13 GMT7
Also available at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week226.html
February 23, 2003
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226)
John Baez
wave function in QM and QED26 Feb 2006 17:33 GMT1
Does the wave function move in space? In QM it seems to me that it
doesnt.
But the EM wave which through the vector-potential can be thought of as
a wave function of the photon is moving with c. ????
Attaching conductive cable to orbital object24 Feb 2006 19:34 GMT6
A heavy, lengthy--say 20-30 km long--conductive cable attacjed to an Earth
orbiting object (the Shuttle), tests have shown a considerable electric
charge being generated as the cable speeds through Earth's electromagnetic
field, question is: Would the cable's mass and extension ...
Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einsteni's equations24 Feb 2006 01:35 GMT1
John Baez wrote:
> Happy New Year from two former moderators, John and Ted!
>
> Ted Bunn has just used my simple formulation of Einstein's equation
Radiation's equivalence principle24 Feb 2006 01:35 GMT11
Why is that an accelerated charge radiates in a zero-valued
gravitational field, whereas a charge in free-fall in a non-zero
gravitational field does not? Doesn't this contradict Einstein's
Equivalence Principle? Are we in fact already assured, via measurement,
rest mass/relativistic mass question24 Feb 2006 01:35 GMT11
I was thinking about something and got confused so I thought I will
post it here and hopefully someone more knowledgeable than me can clear
the confusion.
As a thought experiment, suppose, we are accelerating a proton in a
Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge24 Feb 2006 01:35 GMT2
   Regarding my paper
   S. Parrott, "Radiation from a uniformly accelerated charge
       and the equivalence principle",
       Found. Phys. 32 (2002), 407-440,
3 time dimensions23 Feb 2006 22:37 GMT1
This may have been discussed earlier.
If so, can someone point me to the thread? Else, any comments?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0510010
"Interpreting quantum mechanics(QM) by classical physics seems like an
Solid State Physics Q about ice melting point23 Feb 2006 22:36 GMT1
In today's New York Times Science Times section -- which you can also read
on-line at
   http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/21/science/21ice.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
in an article about the unknown reasons for the slipperiness of ice occurs
Curvature by Cartan's method?23 Feb 2006 22:36 GMT5
I have a little problem with Cartan's method for the calculation of the
curvature. If I understood right you start by defining your orthonormal
frame 1-forms o^a and then use the vanishing of the torsion (the first
structure equation)
Nuclear fusion22 Feb 2006 23:20 GMT9
Does anyone, preferably several, theoretical physicists on this forum
believe that a Manhattan type project could produce a viable fusion energy
producer in the next 10 years?
Looking for a concept22 Feb 2006 23:20 GMT12
Since there are people here interested in the interpretation of
measurement in quantum mechanics, I have a question to ask about them.
The concept of observer, which is quite absolute/independent in quantum
mechanics setting. Carlo Rovelli has tried to introduce a kind of
The Kitchen Sink Mystery20 Feb 2006 20:51 GMT1
Turn on the tap in your kitchen sink and bring the flow of water to a
narrow, yet unbroken streamline. Now put your finger into the
streamline and look closely at the point where your finger touches the
water. You should see standing wave patterns in the water column just
Modular Invariance20 Feb 2006 02:46 GMT4
I am confused about the significance of modular invariance in Conformal
Field Theory.  What do statements like "a good conformal theory, has to
be modular invariant", really mean?
I understand that any CFT on the torus has to be modular invariant, to
commutators and translation operators19 Feb 2006 15:42 GMT5
I'm currently working through Julian Schwinger's "Quantum Mechanics"
book and there's an exercise I cannot solve. Below q and p are
operators with [q,p] = i and q' is a number.
-----
Pages: 1 2 3 January, 2006
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.