| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Is neutron-neutron fusion easier to facilitate than proton-proton | 31 Dec 2007 09:32 GMT | 1 |
Neutron-neutron fusion is an example of nuclear fusion because neutrons are nucleons. Is it possible to solve the energy crisis using neutron-neutron fusion? Can this fusion be used to generated sufficient amounts of power? One advantage to neutron-neutron fusion over H-H
|
| In the spirit of Xmas... | 29 Dec 2007 18:22 GMT | 2 |
If Moderator allows it for the festive season, you might be amused by this link, from the Boing Boing blog 25/12/07, apparently concerning an ether-drift-detecting machine from 1932 (sic). http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/24/queer-machine-checks-up-on-ether-drift/
|
| Eigenstates of interacting and non-interacting Hamiltonian | 29 Dec 2007 11:48 GMT | 1 |
Have multi-particle state of full Hamiltonian and one-particle state of free Hamiltonian a non-zero scalar product? Intuitively one can say that scalar product of such states should be zero because each of these states mentioned above belongs to different (orthogonal)
|
| QG/QM without spacetime | 26 Dec 2007 19:41 GMT | 4 |
I'm beginning a research on the different approaches to QG (or also calssical QM) where the attempt to introduce the notion of spacetime as an emergent concept is made. I would like to find for introductory material which describes in one (or few) papers these different
|
| Black Hole Entropy calculation by Loop Quantum Gravity | 24 Dec 2007 15:35 GMT | 1 |
I flipped through two papers (gr-qc/0005126, gr-qc/9710007) and found out that they calculated the black hole entropy by counting the number of states of which the area lie between A-l_p^2 and A+l_p^2 where l_p is the planck length. I wonder why this is not between A-l_p^2/2 and A
|
| operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar | 20 Dec 2007 22:45 GMT | 16 |
I am reading John Baez's writing on energy-time uncertainty and have a question about his claim of the non-existance of any observable varaible T satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar. In fact, for a classical harmonic oscillator, H=P if we use action-angle variables P
|
| On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter example?? | 20 Dec 2007 14:26 GMT | 38 |
From QM follows that the position of a photon can not be determined better than L (de Broglie wavelength). Suppose one creates a wave in the meter range - say L=2m. Could the photons in this wave go through a tube of radius 1 cm?
|
| Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks? | 18 Dec 2007 18:53 GMT | 8 |
In cloud chambers (or bubble/spark/crystal detectors,) do MeV photons leave trajectory-tracks like particles do? I've been arguing with myself about the details of laser amplification, and it doesn't make sense to me that stimulated
|
| Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces | 17 Dec 2007 16:28 GMT | 17 |
This is an expansion of the reply issued back in April or May in sci.math.research to: This Week's Finds: Week 250 2007 April 26
|
| A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants | 15 Dec 2007 23:09 GMT | 4 |
In PF, Marcus notes: "I see that the whole contents of EPL from July thru December 1986 is free to download until the end of the year. If you (or anyone else) sees any other paper that might be of special historical interest,
|
| Electric pulse attenuation | 11 Dec 2007 21:39 GMT | 11 |
Hallo to all, I have been reading a paper regarding electric pulse attenuation and the values are quoted in dB. The conversion to dB was done by multiplying the value with (20log10e) where "e" is the base of the
|
| Question about Everett's Quantum Theory | 09 Dec 2007 20:18 GMT | 4 |
I ask this question only of believers in Everett's many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. How small an event will be accompanied by a splitting into (two?, many?) worlds? Is there a world where some protozoan flicks its
|
| Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR? | 08 Dec 2007 20:01 GMT | 15 |
Is there a formal proof that the 2-body problem in GR cannot be solved exactly? If so can someone point me to it? Thanks
|
| Cleaner quantum gravitation? | 08 Dec 2007 20:01 GMT | 3 |
http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2274 The cosmological constant is claimed to be tamed and computable. Curious... "The Poincare' group generalizes the Galilei group for high-velocity
|
| Hamiltonian for damped harmonic oscillator | 08 Dec 2007 20:01 GMT | 1 |
In a different thread (http://groups.google.com.au/group/ sci.physics.research/browse_frm/thread/836f60ae8caec5a8/ cd0d72b214648c59?hl=en#cd0d72b214648c59), as somewhat as an aside, Igor Khavkine posed the following problem:
|