Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Q:Negative water pressure electrolysis?15 Jul 2008 18:38 GMT5
This was posted on Sci.math but with little response so sorry for cross
posting. Is this the right Usenet group for this question?
Q:Negative water pressure electralosis! Posted: Jul 3, 2008 12:56 PM  on
Sci.math
Is there a rigorous definition of "quasiparticle"?13 Jul 2008 19:53 GMT1
Is there any (general accepted) conceptual precise and mathematically
rigorous  definition of the concepts "particle" and "quasiparticle" in
the framework of non-relativistic quantum mechanics?
I am mainly interested in quasiparticles, but I think if there is a
Who coined the term "relativistic mass"?13 Jul 2008 03:35 GMT13
[Moderator's note: Lines reformatted to make them shorter.  Although 80
is a maximum to enable nice display on almost all terminals, it's better
to keep your own, original, unquoted text in posts at 72 characters per
line or less, to enable it to be quoted a couple of times and ...
The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?11 Jul 2008 15:01 GMT2
There has been a fair amount of discussion on sci.physics.foundations in
the thread "Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden
Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?" regarding the fact that the velocity
operator "alpha" of the Dirac Hamiltonian appears to suggest that a
What exactly is wrong with Huygens' principle in two dimensions?10 Jul 2008 16:40 GMT20
[This issue is still unlear in all discussions
of the topic, even after a thorough search,
and despite a similar positing some weeks ago
in another group.]
Special Relativity with an Aether Velocity10 Jul 2008 03:20 GMT5
The issue of causal signature has importance for four major
applications:
* the design of more refined empirical tests to determine what the
spacetime signature actually is
z shift in 'rigid' linearly accelerating reference frames.08 Jul 2008 11:31 GMT20
In the past, I have usually assumed that the z shift distance
relationship in a linearly accelerating reference frame could be
obtained by naive application of the gravitational Doppler shift thus:
1 + z = 1 / (1 - g.d/c^2)
Supersymmetry generator(s) ?05 Jul 2008 14:44 GMT1
I'm confused about the following three questinos.
Suppose we have local N=(1,0) supersymmetry in 10-dimensional
minkowski spacetime. In 10-dimensions we have two real irreducible
unique 16-dimensional majorana-weyl representations of Spin(9,1)
GRAVITY02 Jul 2008 21:18 GMT11
[ Mod. note: In the future, please avoid ALL CAPS and use standard
   capitalization in your posts.  -ik ]
HAVE THE DETETCTORS INSTALLED AT VARIOUS PLACES TO DETECT THE
GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AS TOLD BY EINSTEIN BEEN ABLE TO DETECT SOMETHING
Pages: 1 2 June, 2008
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.