Natural Science Forum / Physics / Research

Consider a particle moving in x-v phase space, v=\dot{x}, such that
the function f(x,v) is a constant. Let is be known that f(x,v) is not
the Hamiltonian in x-v system, meaning that f(x,v) does not satisfy
the Hamilton equations of motion. Under what conditions on f(x,v) can

Below I link a third draft of the effort to obtain a closed form
solutions to Gaussians with fields up to fourth order.
http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/polynomial-solution-writeup-5.pdf
Thanks to Charles Francis and others who helped me navigate through some

Considering an EM interaction between two charged
objects separated by a macroscopic distance.  Are there
any constraints on or knowledge of the wavelengths of the
exchanged photons?

Why Poisson brackets are related to symmetries and conservative
quantities?

Is holonomicness necessary for Hamilton and Lagrange formalism? And in
this regard could we say that Newton's EQs are more general than
others?

Are Newoton's Eqs. Lagrange formalism and Hamilton Equations the same
and equal? Or one is more general than another?

HRONOYA <http://www.hronoya.org/hronoyas.gif>
The first in a series of lectures from prof. Velimir Abramovic and
Boris
Petrovic, held in the NIKOLA TESLA MUSEUM - BELGRADE SERBIA

[Moderator's note:  I have set followups to the poster.  -P.H.]
CALL FOR PAPERS
Special issue on Optical SuperComputing
Natural Computing journal, Springer-Verlag

I have three questions about Iorio's recent paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0756
He writes that the astronomer E.V. Pitjeva
phenomenologically estimated a statistically significant non-zero

[[Mod. note -- Responses should probably go directly to the poster;
I have set  Followups-To:  accordingly.  -- jt]]
hi there
I want to study on smart materilas ın a physics graduate program. But