| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| The GR metric in LeSagian Exponential Form... | 30 Nov 2004 21:07 GMT | 16 |
Way back in 01 January 1998 I posted http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=68k8q3%24cru%40sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com&rnum=6& filter=0 In which I said, -------------------------->
|
| The Geodesic Glider (Flying Saucer) | 30 Nov 2004 21:07 GMT | 1 |
Clarifications. Note that the PV theory of Hal Puthoff promoted by Eric Davis in the USAF report says that black holes do not exist. This is one reason why Lawrence Kraus labeled the USAF report bogus and crackpot. It is also
|
| Why is the speed of light as it is | 30 Nov 2004 12:25 GMT | 122 |
This is a question I wanted to ask for a long time. Why is the speed of light as it is that is ~ 3* 10^8 . Could anyone pls point me to some links not how it was measured, but why it is so, and why the significance of that particular number??.
|
| Interpreting the rotating disk metric | 30 Nov 2004 12:12 GMT | 3 |
I ask for help in interpreting the space-time diagram of a rotating disk. Refer to this treatise, http://www.smcm.edu/nsm/physics/SMP03S/KeatingB.doc.pdf and go down to page 17, to the diagram labelled "Figure 4" (but it's actually figure 3). It
|
| You can know Gods Thought But not as God's | 30 Nov 2004 01:45 GMT | 5 |
Einstein wanted to know God's thoughts and whether or not he knew he achieved this he did. Hawking talked about knowing the mind of God. He knows a thought of God but as man does not as God.
|
| Definition of a Field | 29 Nov 2004 18:30 GMT | 36 |
A field is a smooth mapping from a manifold into its tangent bundle such that the composition of the field with the natural projection of the tangent bundle to the manifold is the identity. That is what a field is.
|
| Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity | 29 Nov 2004 18:24 GMT | 1 |
Examining Spatial Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity Acceleration is defined in elementary mathematics and physics texts as the rate of change of the rate of change of position with respect to time. Mathematically expressed, it is the second derivative of position ...
|
| Re. Re. How the speed of light invariance follows from Lorentz contraction. | 29 Nov 2004 14:38 GMT | 4 |
Sorry but your comments are outdated. You don't seem to be informed of the debates which have occured during the 10 last years in International meetings about the real and apparent measurements.
|
| Post your problem at www.innoengineer.com | 29 Nov 2004 11:04 GMT | 2 |
Innoengineer is an innovative problem solver in engineering. Innoengineer doesn't charge a fee for subscribers. Innoengineer allows registered users to post their complex engineering problems and seek solutions from our pool of specialized professional engineers.
|
| Helical wave particles. | 29 Nov 2004 10:12 GMT | 48 |
HELICAL WAVE PARTICLES. Helical particle waves consist of helical-wave particles which are equally spaced along the helical trajectory they follow. Any small particle such as a neutron, proton, or electron etc. will become a helical wave particle when
|
| Trying to understand a "paradox" | 29 Nov 2004 08:37 GMT | 13 |
There's a chance this one is something already "out there", but I haven't seen it before. A friend gave me this "paradox" based on the train-and-embankment scenario, and although I can see where the problem lies, I can't see the actual problem...
|
| Article: A Century of Einstein | 29 Nov 2004 06:46 GMT | 254 |
A Century of Einstein Scientific American has covered Einstein's theories--and the refinements and reactions to them--ever since scientists began to grasp the import of his landmark 1905 papers. Read on for a sampling of our reports, some by leading
|
| Newton's Principia: Definitions: I - IV | 29 Nov 2004 06:25 GMT | 3 |
This is the first chapter of Newton's Principia, split into two posts: (hopefully with no OCR nasties) [quote starts]
:: D E F I N I T I O N S |
| The Magic of Special Relativity Exposed | 29 Nov 2004 06:23 GMT | 10 |
"Eric Gisse" <fsegg@uaf.edu> wrote in message news:fd0fc2fa.0411280404.3bb83278@posting.google.com...
> "Eugene Shubert" <http://www.everythingimportant.org> wrote in > message news:<41a96b4c@sys13.hou.wt.net>... |
| why vacuum particles do not interact with gravity | 29 Nov 2004 03:25 GMT | 2 |
If vacuum energy particles are so tightly packed together that they are a planck distance apart - 10^-35 metres - then a gravitational wave would be unable to compress them and so the particles would not interact via gravity.
|