Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / January 2005

In another post Tom Roberts wrote:
'The standard model of particle physics is the currently-accepted theory of
the interactions of elementary particles; it accurately describes about 99%
of what we know about particle interactions. The standard model is a

The Maxwell-Lorentz-Einstein Fraud
--------------------------------------------------------
Preamble
--------------

Are SR's EM Covariants invariably unproven?
That's what Bilge has led me believe (through his failure to followup), the
following being the entirety of the thread.
How are my conclusions from his response wrong? Please be a wee bit

THE (Fossilized) WOOLLY MAMMOTH;
common name for several extinct species of the elephant family
(Mammuthus Primigenius)::

The general theory is that before the big bang time did not exist, so
nothing could be experienced so reality "as we know it didnt exist.
Is it just me or does anyone else have a real problem with that.

The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
    The present philosophy in theoretical physics is to search for
mathematical relationships that predict experimental results that are then used
to verify the validity of the mathematics in defining our physical Universe,

Paul Zielinski has been trying to separate out the real intrinsic
geometry from the appearance of coordinate transformations. He has
failed to get anywhere specific for three or more years because he is
not familiar with the Cartan tetrad way of doing Einstein's gravity

Hello a while back I watched the public television
series on the "String Theory" and enjoyed it, but
I can not figure why they are calling this another
"dimension".  Since high school algebra we've known

The usual way of describing special realativity is to describe
Michelsson-Morleys experiment, draw the conclusion that either is the Earth
not moving with respect to the ether or there is no ether, and then exclude
the first alternativ.

I was on the CERN site, but I still would like to know:
About how many cycles per second (around the ring) does a particle go?
Can they acccellerate neutrons or other chargeless particles?  How? And
what good do magnets do in that case, anyway?

A Rebuttal to the Claims in "Lesage's Shadows*"
*http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath131/kmath131.htm
Introduction:
The Mathpages site as a whole contains no attributions, no references, no

                   Sam, Joe, a mosquito and a ladder.
                                  by Androcles
Much of this story is credited to Daryl McCullough, only the ladder
was added by me.  It explains the origins of Einstein's Special

The local one ways speed of light as measured by the local observer, in his
frame, using absolute synchrony are:
C'(one way forth) = 1 / (C+V) * C; observer at .5 C ; C' = .66666666 C
C''(one way back) = 1 / (C-V) * C; observer at .5 C ;  C'' = 2 C

100 years ago, in June 1905, Albert Einstein, who IMO was the greatest
brain that ever lived, produced his Theory of Special Relativity, which
showed that the speed of light is approx. 186,000 miles per second,
measured from any observer, regardless of how fast that observer is

Could be there something before big bang?
No space, no time. But what?
Is this kind of subject, something that concern cosmology or philosophy or
both of them?