| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| gravity is fake | 01 Jun 2005 00:02 GMT | 1 |
is the unwritten rule of the road and the unexplored power of geometry keeping us close to the earth surface, there is no gravity anywhere, I see no gravity, follow the rules in the book and you get where you are going in no time
|
| Postscientism | 31 May 2005 17:12 GMT | 1 |
http://www.wbabin.net/valev/valev8.htm Pentcho Valev
|
| Gravity | 31 May 2005 08:46 GMT | 25 |
The electric potential sum of >n particles that sum to neutral is more positive than the electric potential sum of <n particles that sum to neutral and a <n set is more
|
| Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity | 31 May 2005 03:07 GMT | 90 |
A while back I was discussing with Paul Stowe the expression on his web site for the heating caused by LeSagian gravity. Stowe derives a formua for heat emission that is of the form:
|
| No Long Range Virtual Particles | 30 May 2005 22:39 GMT | 50 |
If the quantum vacuum is full, if virtual particles are everywhere they would form an infinitely dense soup that matter would have no choice but to react with. It would be stopped in its tracks.
|
| We can't see light in a black hole Twake? | 30 May 2005 21:42 GMT | 12 |
Twake: Light can not escape a black hole. Therefore we have no way of knowing if it is emitted or not. Nick's brilliant counterpoint:
|
| the basic of matter | 30 May 2005 16:04 GMT | 23 |
what is the very basic property of matter that makes it able to organizes in complex stuctures, in daglig language called for "life" why would matter looks and try to understand itself? are atoms alive?
|
| No Further Accelerations Possible Once Inside a Black Hole. | 30 May 2005 13:27 GMT | 32 |
Once reaching the event horizon a falling object can accelerate no further. It has reached the speed of light. Since by definition freefall is a change in velocity there cannot be said to be anymore gravity(freefall) inside a
|
| How Does Gravity Move Mass Without Resistance? | 30 May 2005 08:37 GMT | 36 |
Gravity can move any size mass without resistance. It can move a potentially *infinite* mass. Though there will never be infinite mass this is the power of gravity. It can move the entire universe!
|
| What is BaT, exactly? | 30 May 2005 07:24 GMT | 90 |
OK, I'm getting slightly annoyed. I want to know the postulates to Henri's theory, the Ballistic Light Theory (BaT for short). My guess (and that's all it is) is that they are the following: [1] Light speed relative to its generator is c. For purposes of this
|
| IRT: Improved Relativity Theory | 30 May 2005 02:42 GMT | 3 |
IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a complete theory of motion. It includes SRT as a subset. Howevert, unlike SRT the equations of IRT are valid in all enviroments.....including gravity. The Postulates of IRT:
|
| How long is a muon when at rest? | 29 May 2005 22:34 GMT | 79 |
Whenever we measure small objects such as muons (or fast moving electrons or protons) they always seem to be moving at nearly the speed of light. According to SR, this contracts their length, so I was wondering how long they would be when at rest with respect to the
|
| Poisson Equation & Cosmological Term | 29 May 2005 18:44 GMT | 6 |
laplace(phi) = 4*pi*G*rho phi = -G*M/r laplace(phi)=0 !!! Proof with sample code from maple:
|
| If 0<>0 | 29 May 2005 13:49 GMT | 2 |
If you give something a value, this value has to be related to some other value to have any meaning. So if you say the speed of light is c then the value assigned to c has to be in relation to some other value. By mathematical definition this value is 0 unless otherwise stated. If c ...
|
| How big is the universal light cone Old Man? | 29 May 2005 11:35 GMT | 12 |
Supposed "events" beyond the bounds of your light cone are out of space and time. [Old Man] Wrong Old Man. There are always events outside your light
|