| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is. | 01 Jul 2005 00:44 GMT | 306 |
Come on DHRs, please define an inertial frame. HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm Sometimes I feel like a complete failure.
|
| Proof that HUP is wrong | 01 Jul 2005 00:06 GMT | 30 |
We fill a box with a radioactive material which randomly emits radiation. The box has a shutter, which is opened and immediately thereafter shut by a clock at a precise time, thereby allowing some radiation to escape. So the time is already known with precision. We
|
| Neutrino's Energy Has Gravity | 30 Jun 2005 20:29 GMT | 10 |
If neutrinos don't have mass they still have energy. They are not nothing! According to GR by their energy they will always effect the gravity of the universe.
|
| the basis of relativity | 30 Jun 2005 20:12 GMT | 128 |
relativity is based on the equivalent principle, then the developed relativity shows that the equivalent principle is wrong
|
| Special Relativity in a Parallel Universe | 30 Jun 2005 19:01 GMT | 7 |
Physics is the mathematical study of all conceivable universes. A universe is a mathematical model that describes spacetime, matter, energy and their interactions. Think of each model universe as filling one page in the atlas of all possible universes.
|
| GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker | 30 Jun 2005 18:54 GMT | 63 |
RE: Discussion of Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge & Tucker. This refs to Weinberg's "Grav&Cosmo", pg 148, "Geodesic Deviation"...
|
| When there is no relative | 30 Jun 2005 17:06 GMT | 6 |
What about the space that's between you and your computer sceen? Is that distance not an absolute if there is no movement? If things are at rest with each other there can
|
| pi and numbers 2 | 30 Jun 2005 03:13 GMT | 10 |
I started a new thread because this is such a busy list and I don't know if old stuff gets looked at. So I am having a problem thinking why pi should be "irrational" I know this is probably basic math but I can't get my head around why an
|
| Supplement to the paper on Doppler effect | 29 Jun 2005 22:34 GMT | 1 |
Dear Colleagues, Some time ago we published the paper "On transverse Doppler effect in frames of classical formalism" http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_1/contents5rus.html#doppler
|
| Einstein & relativity | 29 Jun 2005 14:28 GMT | 5 |
I know that I am coming in from the cold, maybe someone will throw me blanket and make place around the warm fire of knowledge..... I have recently read about the Life of Einstein, yet, I still do not understand the special/general laws of relativity and how it impacts on
|
| GR & QM incompatibility issues (Attn: Bjoern) | 29 Jun 2005 12:05 GMT | 11 |
http://www.pbase.com/scalarp6/image/45314188/original To Bjoern in particular and other Bjoern level veterans in in general. Early this year I mentioned Brian Greene talking about how spaces are turbulent in the microscopic plank realms
|
| Space/time powered by 7D Matrix CPU? | 29 Jun 2005 05:04 GMT | 14 |
[Warning: this message is highly speculative and not recommended for reading by relativity priests such as Uncle Al] What Einstein is showing is that spacetime is always
|
| Hammond Still Unable: Eickmeier Anti-SPOG Re-post | 28 Jun 2005 22:53 GMT | 2 |
This is posted in case Mr. Hammond has missed my posts in his newsreader, although it would be hard to imagine that he has not seen it. I have posted these questions four times in the How to Avoid Homicide thread, and then formally in a new thread called The Eickmeier
|
| 3 time dimensions? | 28 Jun 2005 21:18 GMT | 12 |
Hey all, If velocity change corresponds to rotation in time, could there be 3 time dimensions in which the rotation occurs, one for each spatial dimension? Time would be sort of a parallel universe then.. Really, is
|
| Speed of light in medium constant? | 28 Jun 2005 14:48 GMT | 39 |
Hi again, Is speed of light traveling in a medium constant for all observers? Thanks. (I think, space contraction would render the density of the medium
|