Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / November 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
The Lie that Has Destroyed Theoretical Science30 Nov 2005 15:51 GMT78
Albert Einstein, "Relativity", Chapter 7: "There is hardly a simpler
law in physics than that according to which light is propagated in
empty space. Every child at school knows, or believes he knows, that
this propagation takes place in straight lines with a velocity c=300000
Non-expanding universe30 Nov 2005 15:30 GMT73
Non-expanding universe
Some arguments are given below.
Of course, the anti-Bigbangers are crackpots!  ;-)
Marcel Luttgens
Debate on time travel paradoxes30 Nov 2005 14:24 GMT4
In refutation of Tim's argument below I quote Igor Novikov. Of course
one must read Novikov to get all the details properly.
In reference to Tim's "paradoxes" below:
"Does this paradox demonstrate that time travel [to the past] is
Einstein's Zombies Undergo Conversion. Even Teach One Another.30 Nov 2005 09:26 GMT17
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message news:43870723$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> >
> > "Igor" <thoovler@excite.com> wrote in message
Einstein, Variable Speed of Light and Criminal Zombies30 Nov 2005 01:36 GMT5
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message news:43870723$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
> >
> > "Igor" <thoovler@excite.com> wrote in message
Einstein, the father of this group29 Nov 2005 21:37 GMT27
And he was the father of many aspects of modern physics
       In 1905 he wrote that c could not be attained by massive objects,
100 years and Billions of dollars later, that is still true.
      He raised the age old principle of relativity to a broad, useful  discipline.
Einstein Beyond Redemption29 Nov 2005 13:16 GMT10
Both the thermodynamics cult and the relativity cult have contributed
considerably to the destruction of human rationality. The former made
people repeat endlessly that everything in this world happens because
the entropy increases (see Von Neumann's revelation about entropy in
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"29 Nov 2005 04:44 GMT2
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
    The idea that the velocity of light is the same no matter in
what reference frame it is measured is fundamental to the modern sceince of
physics. The premise started with the confusion resulting from failure of
Feynman's Rainbow & String Theory29 Nov 2005 03:08 GMT1
On Nov 27, 2005, at 1:50 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
“I can say I am a scientist. I find excitement in discovery. The
excitement is not in the fact that you’ve created something, but that
you’ve found something beautiful that’s always been there … I want to
doin physics28 Nov 2005 18:55 GMT9
it seems that tha selfestablished relativist experts in this group
are still thinking that the physics is about reading book
i got news for you, reading books was about maybe one
hundered years ago
AETHER ECHO OF BLACK HOLES28 Nov 2005 13:24 GMT12
Dear Relativity geniuses such as Bilge and Old Man,
What do you think of the following sci-am discussion?
(The following article is reproduced for debunking & educational
purposes only)
Is this Right, which object or both has the attribute gravitational mass?28 Nov 2005 05:14 GMT1
Has this appeared anyplace else;
[QUOTE]
Massive objects also create a strong gravitational force. That is described by by gravitational
mass. Gravitational Mass measures how much gravity an object creates. Inertial Mass measures how an
Did Nick Herbert find an error in Ray Jensen's FTL EPR  Signal Device?28 Nov 2005 05:13 GMT1
On Nov 27, 2005, at 7:24 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Another Go at this:
Round 2. :-)
OK, let's look at this once more. The problem here is how to properly
What does "VIRGO" stand for?28 Nov 2005 04:14 GMT1
 It's clear for "LIGO", "LISA" and so on. But, what does "VIRGO" stand
for?
 Thank you!
 Ian Shea
a new reward27 Nov 2005 23:28 GMT42
I have promised a reward of 1000 US dollars to anyone who will find a
serious mistake in falling space theory. Let's make it better. Now I offer
the same amount of money to anyone who can prove that space time or time
dilation is real.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 October, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.