Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / December 2005

I found the answer which is that they are BOTH THE VERY SAME...
Unfortunately other newsgroup, sci.physics, in particular had bad
replies, one person just gave me a bunch of web links on
hydraulics.....where as the answer was very simple.

"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
    An ambitious experiment to detect gravitational waves from
distant astronomical sources is currently in preparation (Laser
Interferometric

       Hi , everybody in this group
Let's consider light propagation along the x-axis
to left and to right from a given point in 2 relatively moving  IRS.
At any time ,in any of the considered IRS, light travels

It is generally accepted that SR provides the correct explanation for
the Null result of Michelson-Morley Experiment. However, of late more
and more members of the Scientific community are turning to be skeptics
of SR. I would like to request these members to give their opinion as

Hi Tom,
I guess it is safe to say that you cannot calculate the nuclear binding
energy or nuclear binding force using QCD.  So I have earned another
point by developing a simple nuclear binding force equation and nuclear

                      ----------  the SHORT WAY ----------
[1] GPS: the 38 microsec/day drift = (M_e /h)  * (2 G/c^2) * 86400
                     -----------      the LONGIE  -------------
[2] "GPS is a satellite based navigation system. It uses a digital signal at ...

Gravity Gradients
http://www.mines.utah.edu/~wmcemi/appls/grav/
http://www.robertforward.com/Fast_Forward_Fifty_Years.htm

Bery   illium
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/27/science/27eins.html
Joe Fischer
_

it seams that the most selfestablished around here
still consider c the speed of light in vacuum as the max
speed in anywhere
but they know they are wrong becus group velocity can

To examine falling of objects, very heavy objects need to be dropped;
         With light objects, measurement can be made using
either the center of mass, or the bottom edge.
         With very heavy objects, like the moon falling on

 My previous attempt at this was fairly ordinary.
--------
The Inside Out Universe.
Whatever our circumstances of existence, right here is where we are

"The Einstein Hoax"
    The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle"
which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a
mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether Theory) to

To all,
The observed age of a moving object, since it left the observer at t=0, is
equal to:  (t)(c)/(v+c), as compared to its actual age t.
The observed age of a stationary object, which is a distance S away from the

In 2001 Jos Uffink published a paper exposing the appalling obscurity
inherent in fundamental scientific concepts:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/
Since educators would not call Uffink's paper "crank science" (their

bcc
It would take me too much time to try to figure out if he is for real.
Others could do it faster. I say it's 50-50. I am sitting on the fence
there. Too busy with my own stuff.